Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S. v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18778/91

  1 (Art. 6-1) (Eur. Court H.R. Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 23, para. 51, sub-paragraph ; Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para. 29; Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, para. 29 ).
• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86

  ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18778/91

  1 (Art. 6-1) (Eur. Court H.R. Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 23, para. 51, sub-paragraph ; Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para. 29; Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, para. 29 ).
• EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

  AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18778/91

  However, the three rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and third rules are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the general principle enunciated in the first rule (cf., mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court H.R., Agosi judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 17, para. 48; Tre Traktörer AB judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 159, pp. 22-23, para. 54).

 
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10873/84

  TRE TRAKTÖRER AKTIEBOLAG v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18778/91

  However, the three rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and third rules are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the general principle enunciated in the first rule (cf., mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court H.R., Agosi judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 17, para. 48; Tre Traktörer AB judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 159, pp. 22-23, para. 54).
• EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75

  ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18778/91

  1 (Art. 6-1) (Eur. Court H.R. Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 23, para. 51, sub-paragraph ; Albert and Le Compte judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, p. 16, para. 29; Zumtobel judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, para. 29 ).
• EGMR, 23.04.1987 - 9316/81

  Lechner und Hess ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 18778/91

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (see Ettl and Others v. Austria, Comm. Report, 3.7.85, Eur. Court H.R., Series A no. 117, p. 23, paras. 77 et seq.).