Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 07.01.1991 - 14083/88 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1991,17248) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANDERSSON and others v. SWEDEN
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 07.01.1991 - 14083/88
Under the system of protection established by the Convention, it is thus for the national authorities to make the initial assessment both of the existence of a problem of public concern warranting measures of deprivation of property and of the remedial action to be taken (see, mutatis mutandis, the Handyside judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, para. 48). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 07.01.1991 - 14083/88
Clearly, compensation terms are material to the assessment whether the contested legislation respects a fair balance between the various interests at stake and, notably, whether it does not impose a disproportionate burden on the applicants (see the above-mentioned Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment, Series A no. 52, pp. 26 and 28, paras. 69 and 73).
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 23662/12
VUKOVIC v. CROATIA
First, in expropriation cases the Court's power of review is in any event limited to ascertaining whether the choice of compensation terms falls outside the State's margin of appreciation (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 54, Series A no. 98; Andersson v. Sweden, no. 14083/88, Commission decision of 7 January 1991, unpublished; and Grainger and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34940/10, ECHR 10 July 2012).