Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 18605/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,27414) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BUKS v. LATVIA
Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[FRE]
Wird zitiert von ... (2)
- EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4605/05
PETROVA v. LATVIA
As regards recourse to the MADEKKI, the Court observes that its report was produced for the purposes of the criminal investigation into the applicant's complaints (contrast with Žarskis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 33695/03, § 23, 17 March 2009; Ruza v. Latvia (dec.), no. 33798/05, § 19, 11 May 2010; Buks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 18605/03, § 11, 4 September 2012; and Fedosejevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 37546/06, § 17, 19 November 2013). - EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 19437/05
ANTONOVS v. LATVIA
Conversely, in some other cases, where the Government did raise such an objection, the Court did not find it necessary to examine their non-exhaustion argument, because the applicants" complaints about medical care in prison were inadmissible on other grounds under Article 35 of the Convention (see Ruza v. Latvia (dec.), no. 33798/05, § 35, 11 May 2010; Buks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 18605/03, § 38, 4 September 2012; Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, § 128, 25 June 2013; and Fedosejevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 37543/06, § 46, 12 December 2013).