Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 23667/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,61924) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RAFAEL AHLSKOG v. FINLAND
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (8) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 23667/06
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 37520/07
NISKASAARI AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 07.09.2010 - 47182/09
AUTO-NESTOR OY AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 12490/06
ACKERMANN v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008).
- EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 59555/08
LEHTONEN v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 37484/07
MOLANDER v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 23996/06
LIEBKIND v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 24405/07
LEHTINEN v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 13224/05
LIUKSILA v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Riihikallio and Others v. Finland, no. 25072/02, §§ 22-27, 31 May 2007; Ekholm v. Finland, no. 68050/01, §§ 62-66, 24 July 2007; and Rafael Ahlskog v. Finland, no. 23667/06, §§ 18-24, 13 November 2008).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.06.2012 - 48339/99, 23667/06, 2511/02, 24732/06, 4799/03, 36288/97, 33173/05, 39509/08, 39105/05, 64436/01, 5635/09, 17889/07, 22175/06, 34147/96, 41585/98, 43160/98, 45618/04, 11704/03, 28631/05, 77138/01, 10615/03, 13102/03, 16385/07, 45952/08, 38158/07, 26189/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 06.06.2012 - 48339/99, 23667/06, 2511/02, 24732/06, 4799/03, 36288/97, 33173/05, 39509/08, 39105/05, 64436/01, 5635/09, 17889/07, 22175/06, 34147/96, 41585/98, 43160/98, 45618/04, 11704/03, 28631/05, 77138/01, 10615/03, 13102/03, 16385/07, 45952/08, 38158/07, 26189/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,88191)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.06.2012 - 48339/99, 23667/06, 2511/02, 24732/06, 4799/03, 36288/97, 33173/05, 39509/08, 39105/05, 64436/01, 5635/09, 17889/07, 22175/06, 34147/96, 41585/98, 43160/98, 45618/04, 11704/03, 28631/05, 77138/01, 10615/03, 13102/03, 16385/07, 45952/08, 38158/07, 26189/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,88191)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Juni 2012 - 48339/99, 23667/06, 2511/02, 24732/06, 4799/03, 36288/97, 33173/05, 39509/08, 39105/05, 64436/01, 5635/09, 17889/07, 22175/06, 34147/96, 41585/98, 43160/98, 45618/04, 11704/03, 28631/05, 77138/01, 10615/03, 13102/03, 16385/07, 45952/08, 38158/07, 26189/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,88191)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,88191) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KANGASLUOMA ET 34 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA FINLANDE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KANGASLUOMA AND 34 OTHER CASES AGAINST FINLAND
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.05.2002 - 48339/99
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 48339/99
- EGMR, 06.06.2012 - 48339/99, 23667/06, 2511/02, 24732/06, 4799/03, 36288/97, 33173/05, 39509/08, 39105/05, 64436/01, 5635/09, 17889/07, 22175/06, 34147/96, 41585/98, 43160/98, 45618/04, 11704/03, 28631/05, 77138/01, 10615/03, 13102/03, 16385/07, 45952/08, 38158/07, 26189/06
Wird zitiert von ... (2)
- EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 10391/06
NEVALA v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Kangasluoma v. Finland, no. 48339/99, 20 January 2004 and Lehtonen v. Finland, no. 11704/03, 13 June 2006). - EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 32681/06
MANNER v. FINLAND
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against Finland (see, for example, Kangasluoma v. Finland, no. 48339/99, 20 January 2004 and Lehtonen v. Finland, no. 11704/03, 13 June 2006).