Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EBMER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2010 - 28519/05

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 11.09.2003 - 54536/00

  EMSENHUBER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2010 - 28519/05

  Although their subject-matter was similar, the sets of proceedings were not only technically separate but also concerned separate building permit applications by the applicant's neighbour (see Emsenhuber v. Austria (dec.), no. 54536/00, 11 September 2003).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 5335/07

  [ENG]

  The Court agrees that there were different sets of proceedings, and the various proceedings are thus to be seen separately (see Emsenhuber v. Austria (dec.), no. 54536/00, 11 September 2003; and Ebmer v. Austria (dec.), no. 28519/05, 4 February 2010).
• EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 70176/10

  SCHÜTZ v. AUSTRIA

  Having regard to the overall length of the proceedings of just over four years, the fact that no major delays could be attributed to the authorities, and keeping in mind that the proceedings concerned not only one, but three separate penal orders, the Court is satisfied that in the particular circumstances of the case the length of the proceedings has been in compliance with the reasonable time requirement under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Ebmer v. Austria (dec.), 4 February 2010, 28519/05).
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 24258/07

  [ENG]

  Therefore the proceedings must be seen separately (see, as similar cases, also relating to various sets of proceedings in the context of requests for building permits: Emsenhuber v. Austria (dec.), no. 54536/00, 11 September 2003, Hofbauer v. Austria (dec.), no. 68087/01, 2 September 2004 and Ebmer v. Austria (dec.), no. 28519/05, 4 February 2010; Wurzer v. Austria, no. 5335/07, § 31, 6 March 2012).