Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DRIUCENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA and 18 other applications

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10

  Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  12/10/2022.
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 07.10.2005 - 18/04

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  18/04/2022.
• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  GLUKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  59253/19, 36033/22, 4960/23, and 5696/24, has there been a violation of applicants' right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention? In particular, was the interference prescribed by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim and was it "necessary in a democratic society" (see Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, § 51, 4 July 2023)?.

• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  In all applications, given the circumstances of the present cases, do the applicants come within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Moldova and/or Russia within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention as interpreted by the Court in the cases of Lypovchenko and Halabudenco v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (nos. 40926/16 and 73942/17, §§ 85-87, 20 February 2024) and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 99-111, 23 February 2016)?.
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 25501/07

  NOVIKOVA v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  In applications no. 59253/19 and 4960/23, did the "MRT" authorities' refusal to authorise a public assembly constitute a violation of the applicants' right to freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Convention? In particular, was the interference prescribed by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim and was it "necessary in a democratic society" (see Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501/07 and 4 others, § 106, 26 April 2016)?.
• EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 22200/10

  VARDANEAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  29235/20, 35136/21, 22027/22, 37819/22, and 50411/22, has there been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention? In particular, was the interference prescribed by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim and was it "necessary in a democratic society" (see Vardanean v. Republic of Moldova and Russia, no. 22200/10, §§ 50-57, 30 May 2017; Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, §§ 252-61, ECHR 2015; and Mozer, cited above, § 190)?.
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 13112/07

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  In application no. 37819/22, was the presumption of innocence, guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, respected, especially with regard to the findings of the "MRT court" as to the grounds for the applicant's dismissal in a parallel civil case (see Felix Guţu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 13112/07, 20 October 2020)?.
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 21034/05

  SANDU AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA and 7 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  2201/19, 29235/20, 29328/20, 7803/22, and 36501/22, has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? In particular, was the interference prescribed by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim and was it "necessary in a democratic society (see Sandu and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia, nos. 21034/05 and 7 others, §§ 72-84, 17 July 2018, and Eriomenco, cited above, §§ 75-85)?.
• EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 41660/10

  DOBROVITSKAYA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  54164/21, 22027/22, 40554/22, and 50411/22, has there been a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention with regard to the entry/exit bans issued by the "MRT" authorities? In particular, was the interference prescribed by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim and was it "necessary in a democratic society (see Dobrovitskaya and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [Committee], no. 41660/10 and 5 others, §§ 90-99, 3 September 2019)?.
• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 40926/16

  LYPOVCHENKO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR - 2201/19

  In all applications, given the circumstances of the present cases, do the applicants come within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Moldova and/or Russia within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention as interpreted by the Court in the cases of Lypovchenko and Halabudenco v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (nos. 40926/16 and 73942/17, §§ 85-87, 20 February 2024) and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 99-111, 23 February 2016)?.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG Aachen, 08.07.2025 - 10 K 1784/22

  Flüchtlingsschutz, Verfolgung, häusliche Gewalt, Ehebruch, soziale Gruppe, …

  Rn. 64 Vgl. ausführlich OVG Schl.-H., Urteil vom 12. Dezember 2023 - 2 LB 9/22 -, juris, Rn. 107 ff., m. w. N.; VG Aachen, Urteile vom 6. Mai 2022 - 10 K 1922/20.A -, juris, Rn. 44 f., und vom 28. Januar 2025 - 10 K 10/22.A -, juris, Rn. 107 ff., sowie - 10 K 915/22.A -, juris, Rn. 65 ff.; ebenso VG Köln, Urteil vom 18. April 2023 - 12 K 3652/20.A -, juris, Rn. 34; VG Berlin, Urteil vom 18. März 2025 - 3 K 350/23 A -, juris, Rn. 25; vgl. auch VG Hamburg, Urteil vom 23. Juli 2024 - 10 A 4960/23 -, juris, Rn. 31 ff.