Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SÖYLER v. TURKEY

  Art. 35, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Vote) Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Söyler v. Turkey

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 29411/07
• EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 29411/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 29411/07

  In response to the Government's argument concerning the costs and expenses relating to the proceedings at the national level, the Court reiterates that, if it finds that there has been a violation of the Convention, it may award the applicant the costs and expenses incurred before the national courts for the prevention or redress of the violation (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 56, ECHR 2002-III, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 29411/07

  The Court notes that the general principles applicable in the present case can be found in Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (2 March 1987, § 46-54, Series A no. 113); Hirst (no. 2) ([GC], cited above, §§ 56-71, 74-77 and 82); Frodl v. Austria (no. 20201/04, §§ 28 and 33-35, 8 April 2010), and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) ([GC], cited above, §§ 82-84, 96, 99 and 101-102).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen