Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BAGIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 18705/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2015 - 17356/11

  The Court considers that this complaint falls to be examined only under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and that no separate examination is necessary under Article 13 (compare Namat Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 18705/06, § 57, 8 April 2010).
• EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 31953/11

  TAHIROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2015 - 17356/11

  The relevant domestic law and international documents concerning the rules and requirements for candidate registration, as well as observations made during the 2010 parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan, are summarised in Tahirov v. Azerbaijan (no. 31953/11, §§ 23-31, 11 June 2015).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 28465/11 (anhängig)

  JABBAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Enclosed with their complaints to the CEC, some of the applicants (for example, those in applications nos. 29781/11, 29808/11, 31953/11 and 31959/11) submitted affidavits by a number of voters confirming the authenticity of their signatures and other documents purporting to confirm authenticity of signatures.

  28502/11, 30581/11, 31970/11, 31996/11, 32060/11 and 36702/11, upon examination of the applicants' appeals, the Baku Court of Appeal ordered a forensic handwriting analysis of the applicant's signature lists by a handwriting expert of the Forensic Expert Centre of the Ministry of Justice.

  28502/11, 30581/11, 31970/11, 31996/11, 32060/11 and 36702/11 also questioned the reliability of the forensic expert reports ordered by the Baku Court of Appeal, noting that the experts had issued their opinions within one day, which was a grossly inadequate amount of time for conducting a proper handwriting analysis of hundreds signatures.

  30504/11, 31953/11, 31959/11 and 32060/11, also rely on Article 13 of the Convention in connection with this complaint.

  31953/11, 31959/11 and 32060/11 also complain under Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with the above complaint, that their electoral rights were breached as a part of the deliberate and unlawful practical measures implemented by the Government aimed at restricting the political opposition's participation in the elections and denying its candidates equal conditions with pro-Government candidates.

  28465/11 (Jabbarov), 28502/11 (Vahid Jafarov), 29781/11 (Gaya Aliyev), 29808/11 (Shakir Mammadov), 30473/11 (Fuad Aliyev), 30581/11 (Dadashzade), 31970/11 (Razi Abasov), 31996/11 (Alayif Hasanov), 36702/11 (Behbudov) and 66684/12 (Intigam Aliyev): Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?.

  31953/11 (Tahirov), 31959/11 (Yegana Hajiyeva) and 32060/11 (Khayyam Mammadov): Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their electoral rights on the ground of their political affiliation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?.

  Application no. 31996/11 (Alayif Hasanov): The parties are requested to submit copies of the ConEC decision of 14 October 2010 and the CEC decision of 20 October 2010, as well as all related documents, opinions and results tables of the relevant commissions' "working groups".

  Application no. 32060/11 (Khayyam Mammadov): The parties are requested to submit copies of the ConEC decision of 11 October 2010 and the CEC decision of 16 October 2010, as well as all related documents, opinions and results tables of the relevant commissions' "working groups".

  30504/11.

  31959/11.

  31996/11.

  32060/11.

• EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 28508/11

  ABDALOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Similar findings were made in a number of other cases (see Gasimli and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 25330/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Vugar Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 24853/11 and 3 others, 17 December 2015; Bagirov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 17356/11 and 4 others, 17 December 2015; Soltanov and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos. 30362/11 and 4 others, 16 June 2016; Gaya Aliyev and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos.