Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BALAKIREV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 ...

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 16/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 61109/10

  16/04/2010.

  16/04/2010.

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 61109/10

  As regards the remaining applicants' complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11

  LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 61109/10

  19/11/1963.
• EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 23786/02

  KRASNOSHAPKA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 61109/10

  In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v. Ukraine, (no. 23786/02, 30 November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 3431/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2019 - 61109/10

  Therefore the length of the proceedings (5 years, 9 months, 1 day and 5 years, 9 months, 10 days, respectively, before 3 levels of jurisdiction) was not excessive or unreasonable (see, Yuryeva and Yuryev v. Ukraine, no. 3431/03, § 43, 31 July 2012).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.07.2020 - 310/15

  Mugemangango v. Belgium

  Lorsque le droit national confiait l'examen des litiges postélectoraux à une instance juridictionnelle, la Cour a examiné l'affaire uniquement sous l'angle de l'article 3 du Protocole no 1, considérant qu'il n'était pas nécessaire d'examiner séparément l'article 13 de la Convention (voir, par exemple, Podkolzina, précité, § 45, Kerimova, précité, §§ 31-32, Gahramanli et autres, précité, § 56, Davydov et autres, précité, § 200, et Abdalov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 28508/11 et 33773/18, § 108, 11 juillet 2019) ou qu'aucune question distincte ne se posait sous l'angle de cette disposition (Riza et autres, précité, § 95).
• EGMR, 22.07.2025 - 15653/22

  BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Consequently, the Court has to satisfy itself that the conditions in which applicants' individual electoral rights were exercised did not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness (see Abdalov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 28508/11 and 33773/18, § 91, 11 July 2019; Namat Aliyev, see above, § 75; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) [GC], no. 126/05, § 84, 22 May 2012; and Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.