Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  NUZHNENKO v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 15367/14

  SHMORGUNOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 58006/21

  On the dates indicated in the appended table the applicants were beaten and arrested by police officers while participating in the series of protests in Ukraine between 21 November 2013 and 21 February 2014, commonly referred to as "Euromaidan" and/or "Maidan" (see Shmorgunov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 15367/14 and 13 others, §§ 9-17, 21 January 2021).

  Were the applicants subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, having regard to their allegations that they were ill-treated by the police (see Shmorgunov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 15367/14 and 13 others, §§ 359-74, 21 January 2021)?.

• EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 23144/93

  OZGUR GUNDEM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 58006/21

  Regarding application no. 58006/21, has there been an interference with Mr S. Nuzhnenko's right to receive and impart information and ideas as a journalist on account of his alleged ill-treatment and arbitrary detention by the police, and, if so, has it been contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, §§ 57-70, 2 October 2012, and Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 42-46, ECHR 2000 III)?.
• EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 23853/02

  KARNAUSHENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 58006/21

  Has the length of the judicial examination of Mr S. Nuzhnenko's, Mr O. Kravtsov's, Mr A. Shmyndyuk's and Mr I. Kobzar's compensation claims (applications nos. 58006/21, 40104/22, 26997/24) been in breach of the "reasonable time" requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Karnaushenko v. Ukraine, no. 23853/02, §§ 47-62, 30 November 2006)?.
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR - 58006/21

  Regarding application no. 58006/21, has there been an interference with Mr S. Nuzhnenko's right to receive and impart information and ideas as a journalist on account of his alleged ill-treatment and arbitrary detention by the police, and, if so, has it been contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, §§ 57-70, 2 October 2012, and Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no. 23144/93, §§ 42-46, ECHR 2000 III)?.
• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 74663/17

  KOROTYUK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 58006/21

  40104/22 and 26997/24, has there been an interference with Mr O. Kravtsov's and Mr. A. Shmyndyuk's right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the damage caused to their cars and the authorities' alleged failure to compensate for that damage (see Korotyuk v. Ukraine, no. 74663/17, §§ 36-57, 19 January 2023)? If so, has that interference been in compliance with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen