Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  APPOLONOV v. RUSSIA

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 45526/99

  GAYDUK ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.08.2002 - 47578/01

  However, the Court recalls that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not oblige a State to maintain the purchasing power of sums deposited with financial institutions (see X. v. the Federal Republic of Germany, application no. 8724/79, Commission decision of 6 March 1980, Decisions and Reports 20, p. 226; Rudzinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 45223/99, 7 September 1999, ECHR 1999-VI; or, as a more recent authority, Gayduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 45526/99, 2 July 2002, ECHR 2002-...).
• EGMR, 07.09.1999 - 45223/99

  RUDZINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.08.2002 - 47578/01

  However, the Court recalls that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not oblige a State to maintain the purchasing power of sums deposited with financial institutions (see X. v. the Federal Republic of Germany, application no. 8724/79, Commission decision of 6 March 1980, Decisions and Reports 20, p. 226; Rudzinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 45223/99, 7 September 1999, ECHR 1999-VI; or, as a more recent authority, Gayduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 45526/99, 2 July 2002, ECHR 2002-...).
• EKMR, 06.03.1980 - 8724/79

  X.v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.08.2002 - 47578/01

  However, the Court recalls that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not oblige a State to maintain the purchasing power of sums deposited with financial institutions (see X. v. the Federal Republic of Germany, application no. 8724/79, Commission decision of 6 March 1980, Decisions and Reports 20, p. 226; Rudzinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 45223/99, 7 September 1999, ECHR 1999-VI; or, as a more recent authority, Gayduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 45526/99, 2 July 2002, ECHR 2002-...).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.02.2005 - 69315/01

  SUKHORUBCHENKO v. RUSSIA

  It further recalls that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not oblige a State to maintain the purchasing power of amounts deposited with financial institutions (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-X; Appolonov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47578/01, 29 August 2002).