Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.03.2020 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18 (https://dejure.org/2020,43309)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. März 2020 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18 (https://dejure.org/2020,43309)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,43309) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BARTOLO PARNIS AND OTHERS v. MALTA
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BARTOLO PARNIS AND OTHERS v. MALTA and 3 other applications
Art. 13Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 47045/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
The Court has previously held that rent control schemes and restrictions on an applicant's right to terminate a tenant's lease constitutes control of the use of property within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 1 (see for example, Amato Gauci v. Malta, no. 47045/06, § 52, 15 September 2009 and Anthony Aquilina v. Malta, no. 3851/12, § 54, 11 December 2014). - EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 46931/12
APAP BOLOGNA v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
Moreover, the Court notes that apartments 12B and 37D, 39D and 48D, 26C and 40D, and 32C have been returned to the respective applicants, and thus no unfavourable consequences have continued to persist (see, a contrario, Apap Bologna v. Malta, no. 46931/12, § 47, 30 August 2016). - EGMR - 55747/16 (anhängig)
PORTANIER v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
In this connection it is also noted that a reasonable explanation was given by the domestic courts justifying the costs the applicants were made to pay (see, a contrario, Zammit and Vassallo v. Malta, no. 43675/16, § 42, 28 May 2019 and Portanier v. Malta, no. 55747/16, § 24, 27 August 2019).
- EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 3851/12
AQUILINA v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
The Court has previously held that rent control schemes and restrictions on an applicant's right to terminate a tenant's lease constitutes control of the use of property within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 1 (see for example, Amato Gauci v. Malta, no. 47045/06, § 52, 15 September 2009 and Anthony Aquilina v. Malta, no. 3851/12, § 54, 11 December 2014). - EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 31102/06
PAPLAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
Whether an individual has victim status may also depend on the amount of compensation awarded by the domestic courts and the effectiveness (including the promptness) of the remedy affording the award (see Paplauskienė v. Lithuania, no. 31102/06, § 51, 14 October 2014). - EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 69287/14
GRECH AND OTHERS v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
Therefore, no further action preventing the violation or its continuation which had come to an end pending proceedings, was required by the Constitutional Court (see, for example, Grech and Others v. Malta, no. 69287/14, § 61, 15 January 2019). - EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 43675/16
ZAMMIT AND VASSALLO v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
In this connection it is also noted that a reasonable explanation was given by the domestic courts justifying the costs the applicants were made to pay (see, a contrario, Zammit and Vassallo v. Malta, no. 43675/16, § 42, 28 May 2019 and Portanier v. Malta, no. 55747/16, § 24, 27 August 2019).
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.10.2021 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18 (https://dejure.org/2021,40342)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Oktober 2021 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18 (https://dejure.org/2021,40342)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,40342) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BARTOLO PARNIS AND OTHERS v. MALTA
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 49378/18
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18, 49380/18, 49496/18, 49676/18
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 14013/19
CAUCHI v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
49378/19 and 3 others, § 38, 24 March 2020) and Cauchi v. Malta (no. 14013/19, § 22, 25 March 2021).However, the Court notes that the properties have not been returned to the applicants (see, a contrario, Bartolo Parnis and Others, cited above, § 49), nor has the Constitutional Court ordered the eviction of the tenants or alternatively put in place a higher future rent (see Cauchi v. Malta, no. 14013/19, § 30, 25 March 2021 and Marshall and Others v. Malta, no. 79177/16, § 71-72, 11 February 2020).
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 46931/12
APAP BOLOGNA v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
The Court reiterates its general principles as set out in Apap Bologna v. Malta (no. 46931/12, §§ 76-79, 30 August 2016). - EGMR - 55747/16 (anhängig)
PORTANIER v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
The Court has repeatedly found that constitutional redress proceedings, in particular the Constitutional Court, cannot be considered an effective remedy for the purposes of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning arguable complaints in respect of the rent laws in place, which, though lawful and pursuing legitimate objectives, impose an excessive individual burden on applicants (ibid § 91; see also, for example, Portanier v. Malta, no. 55747/16, § 53, 27 August 2019).
- EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 79177/16
MARSHALL v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
However, the Court notes that the properties have not been returned to the applicants (see, a contrario, Bartolo Parnis and Others, cited above, § 49), nor has the Constitutional Court ordered the eviction of the tenants or alternatively put in place a higher future rent (see Cauchi v. Malta, no. 14013/19, § 30, 25 March 2021 and Marshall and Others v. Malta, no. 79177/16, § 71-72, 11 February 2020). - EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 31102/06
PAPLAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
Whether an individual has victim status may also depend on the amount of compensation awarded by the domestic courts and the effectiveness (including the promptness) of the remedy affording the award (see Paplauskienė v. Lithuania, no. 31102/06, § 51, 14 October 2014). - EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 49684/18
AZZOPARDI AND OTHERS v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 49378/18
Indeed, in that same application, the remaining complaints in respect of the other apartments had been declared inadmissible by the President acting as Single Judge at communication stage (see Azzopardi and Others v. Malta, no. 49684/18, Committee decision, 12 May 2020, § 4).
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.