Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NEVOSTRUYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11

  MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 51185/11

  The Court has to examine whether the authorities knew or should have known of the existence of a real and immediate risk that D.N. would commit suicide, and, if so, whether they did all that could reasonably have been expected of them to avoid that risk materialising (see Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 67, 1 June 2017).
• EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 44425/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 51185/11

  However, as regards the criminal investigation, she did not indicate any particular omissions or deficiencies which could have rendered it inadequate (see Baklanov v. Ukraine, no. 44425/08, § 88, 24 October 2013).
• EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 13596/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 51185/11

  During the two years of his military service, and in particular, before his conscription, before his enlistment and again in December 2005, D.N. underwent psychological examinations and tests, and no risk of suicide was revealed as a result (compare Tikhonova v. Russia, no. 13596/05, § 74, 30 April 2014).
• EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 22490/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 51185/11

  The requirement of public scrutiny is also relevant in this context (see, for instance, Marina Alekseyeva v. Russia, no. 22490/05, § 126, with further references, 19 December 2013).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 62080/09

  VASILYEVA v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

  [1] See Filippovy v. Russia, 19355/09; Khudoroshko v. Russia, 3959/14; Nevostruyeva v. Russia (dec.), 51185/11, 1 June 2021; Nasibullin v. Russia (dec.), 64774/09, 7 January 2020; Pavlova v. Russia (dec.), 25835/10, 28 January 2020; and Khabirov v. Russia, no. 69450/10, 12 October 2021.