Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STROGANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Struck out of the list;Struck out of the list (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• KAG Münster, 18.01.2007 - 10/06

  Abschluss eines beamtenähnlichen Arbeitsvertrages; Ersetzung der Zustimmung der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  Undated, received on 10/06/2016.

  Undated, received on 10/06/2016.

• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 11.07.2014 - 13/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  13/12/1971.

  13/12/1963.

• EGMR, 05.07.2018 - 24/11

  CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  24/11/1949.

• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02

  LIGERES v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  17/02/1977.
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 29920/05

  GERASIMOV v. RUSSIA and 14 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  In the wake of the pilot judgment in the case of Gerasimov and Others v. Russia, on 4 December 2014 the the complaint concerning the non-enforcement was communicated to the Government for settlement or resolution (see Gerasimov and Others v. Russia, nos. 29920/05 and 10 others, §§ 230-31 and point 13 of the operative part, 1 July 2014).
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 35555/05

  KAMNEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  35555/05 and 6 others, § 30, 2 May 2017).
• EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 8243/08

  BAKAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  The Court finds that such agreement shall be considered as a friendly settlement between the parties (see Cesnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 9278/06, § 34, 6 March 2012, and Bakal and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 8243/08, 5 June 2012).
• EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 14330/07

  BELKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  In any event, the Court reiterates its settled case-law to the effect that the arguments as to proper enforcement of domestic decisions should be brought before domestic courts, who are better placed and equipped to assess the particular manner in which the enforcement should be carried out and the debtor' s compliance with the enforcement modalities (see, among many others, Kravchenko and other "military housing" cases v. Russia, nos. 11609/05 and 22 others, § 32, 16 September 2010; Belkin and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 14330/07, 5 February 2009; and Elinna Shevchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 1250/05, 14 October 2010).
• EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 11609/05

  KRAVCHENKO ET AUTRES AFFAIRES " LOGEMENTS MILITAIRES " c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  In any event, the Court reiterates its settled case-law to the effect that the arguments as to proper enforcement of domestic decisions should be brought before domestic courts, who are better placed and equipped to assess the particular manner in which the enforcement should be carried out and the debtor' s compliance with the enforcement modalities (see, among many others, Kravchenko and other "military housing" cases v. Russia, nos. 11609/05 and 22 others, § 32, 16 September 2010; Belkin and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 14330/07, 5 February 2009; and Elinna Shevchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 1250/05, 14 October 2010).
• EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 77056/14

  SHTOLTS AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 51391/07

  77056/14 and 2 others, §§ 87-116 and § 123, 30 January 2018).
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 1250/05

  ELINNA SHEVCHENKO v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 13813/06

  SHIBAYEVA v. RUSSIA + 13 other applications

  In the light of the adoption of the new domestic remedy and in line with its previous decisions, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine separately the admissibility and merits of the applicant's complaint under Article 13 in the relevant part (see, mutatis mutandis, Konstantinova and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 60708/13, §§ 30-33, 5 February 2019; Stroganova and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 51391/07, 6 November 2018; and Tkhyegepso and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 5489/10

  YUNUSOVA v. RUSSIA

  In the light of the adoption of the new domestic remedy and in line with its previous decisions, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine separately the admissibility and merits of the applicant's complaint under Article 13 in the present case (see, mutatis mutandis, Konstantinova and Others, cited above, §§ 30-33; Stroganova and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 51391/07, 6 November 2018; and Tkhyegepso and Others v. Russia, nos.