Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PLICHTA v. POLAND

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 42165/02

  HADRABOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

  Also, the direct responsibility of the applicant or his legal representative in the disclosure must be established with sufficient certainty (see, for example, Hadrabová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42165/02, 25 September 2007; Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798/05, § 68, 15 September 2009; Benjocki and Others v. Serbia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 33566/11

  RAMKOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

  At the same time, Rule 62 § 2 in fine also protects the Court and its own impartiality, by ensuring that should the friendly-settlement negotiations fail, their content will not prejudice the outcome of the contentious proceedings (see Heldenburg v. the Czech Republic (just satisfaction), no. 65546/09, § 25, 9 February 2017, and Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 42, 8 February 2018).
• EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07

  BENJOCKI v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

  5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; and Lesnina Veletrgovina d.o.o., cited above, Arsovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 30206/06, § 41, 15 January 2013; and Barreau and Others v. France (dec.), no. 24697/09, 13 December 2011).
• EGMR, 09.02.2017 - 65546/09

  HELDENBURG v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

  At the same time, Rule 62 § 2 in fine also protects the Court and its own impartiality, by ensuring that should the friendly-settlement negotiations fail, their content will not prejudice the outcome of the contentious proceedings (see Heldenburg v. the Czech Republic (just satisfaction), no. 65546/09, § 25, 9 February 2017, and Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 42, 8 February 2018).
• EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 57990/10

  GORGADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

  In view of the above, the Court considers that the disclosure was clearly attributable to the applicant's representative and not to any other party (see Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, § 21, 2 September 2014).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.06.2026 - 26624/23

  MANDUNDU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Pour que la requête soit abusive, au sens de l'article 35 § 3 a) de la Convention, il faut toutefois que la responsabilité directe du requérant ou de son avocat dans la divulgation soit établie avec suffisamment de certitude (voir, par exemple, Koukakis c. Grèce (déc.) [Comité], no 37659/22, 11 juin 2024, §§ 12-14, Khmaladze c. Géorgie (déc.) [Comité], no 29836/19, 23 novembre 2023, §§ 7-11, et Plichta c. Pologne (déc.) [Comité], no 54127/16, 22 octobre 2019, §§ 22-26, ainsi que les références qui y figurent, en particulier Gorgadze c. Géorgie (déc.), no 57990/10, 2 septembre 2014, §§ 18-22, Abbasov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan (déc.), no 36609/08, 28 mai 2013, §§ 28-35, et Barreau et autres c. France (déc.), no 24697/09, 13 décembre 2011 ; voir aussi, précitées, Mătăsaru, § 36, et Mandil).
• EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 45561/17

  LECHOWICZ v. POLAND

  The general principles regarding the obligation of confidentiality of friendly-settlement negotiations are set out in Plichta v. Poland ([Committee] (dec.), no. 54127/16, §§ 20-22, 22 October 2019, with further references).