Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 7351/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56693) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SIMONCIC v. SLOVENIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 7351/04
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 for a case to be heard within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 7351/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
- EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 49323/06
OROZIM v. SLOVENIA
Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, Simoncic v. Slovenia, no. 7351/04, §§ 23-26, 18 January 2011, Ovnicek v. Slovenia, no. 33561/02, §§ 17-19, 27 April 2006; Solesa v. Slovenia, no. 21464/02, §§ 17-19, 13 April 2006), the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.