Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAMIEV v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 9934/10

  Consequently, the unrelated asylum proceedings cannot, in the particular circumstances of the present case, engage the responsibility of Georgia under Article 3 of the Convention (compare with, for example, Ismoilov and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 2947/06, 12 December 2006 and, by contrast, Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 121-127, Series A no. 215), and the right to political asylum, as such, is not guaranteed either by the Convention or its Protocols (see, among other authorities, Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Kordian v. Turkey (dec.), no. 6575/06, 4 July 2006).
• EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

  CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 9934/10

  That request was based on the Minsk Convention (see Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 266, ECHR 2005-III), to which both Georgia and Uzbekistan were parties.
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 9934/10

  The Court finds no reason to doubt that the Georgian Government were sincere in those statements and will respect their undertaking, bearing in mind the Court's relevant case-law on the matter (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 60, Series A no. 111).
• EGMR, 26.11.2002 - 3314/02

  BILASI-ASHRI c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 9934/10

  Consequently, whilst noting the applicant's above-mentioned allegation, the Court still finds it insufficient, in the light of the other relevant circumstances of the case, to cast doubt, at this stage, on the genuineness and effectiveness of the final judicial discontinuation of the extradition proceedings in the applicant's case (cf. Bilasi-Ashri v. Austria (dec.), no. 3314/02, ECHR 2002-X).
• EGMR, 04.07.2006 - 6575/06

  KORDIAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 9934/10

  Consequently, the unrelated asylum proceedings cannot, in the particular circumstances of the present case, engage the responsibility of Georgia under Article 3 of the Convention (compare with, for example, Ismoilov and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 2947/06, 12 December 2006 and, by contrast, Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 121-127, Series A no. 215), and the right to political asylum, as such, is not guaranteed either by the Convention or its Protocols (see, among other authorities, Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V; Kordian v. Turkey (dec.), no. 6575/06, 4 July 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 11841/21

  WEICKERT v. SLOVENIA

  In the light of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue the examination of the application under Article 37 § 1 in fine (see, mutatis mutandis, Bilasi-Ashri v. Austria (dec.), no. 3314/02, ECHR 2002-X, and Samiev v. Georgia (dec.), no. 9934/10, 16 November 2010).
• EGMR, 06.09.2011 - 63856/10

  POKLONOV v. GEORGIA

  In the light of the foregoing and having due regard to the Supreme Court's decision of 18 February 2011 which irrevocably discontinued the disputed extradition proceedings (cf. Samiev v. Georgia (dec.), no. 9934/10, 16 November 2010), the Court considers that the matter giving rise to the present application has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention.