Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZELILOF v. GREECE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14+3, Art. 14, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 (ill-treatment suffered at the hands of the police and failure to conduct an effective investigation) Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and ...

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  Furthermore, the Court reiterates that in respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 38, and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004).

  In such cases the task of the Court is to decide where the truth lies irrespective of the account given by the police authorities or even the domestic courts (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336).

• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  In fact, this provision also applies when the use of force by State agents is potentially lethal, that is, when the fact that the victim was not killed is fortuitous (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 52 and 54, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).

 
• EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97

  WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  Discrimination is differently treating, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  Bearing in mind the difficulties in policing modern societies, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources, the positive obligation must be interpreted in a way which does not impose an impossible burden on the authorities (see, mutatis mutandis, Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 86, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  Where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 29).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 17060/03

  It is for this reason that the authorities must use all available means to combat racism and racist violence, thereby reinforcing democracy's vision of a society in which diversity is not perceived as a threat but as a source of its enrichment (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 145, 6 July 2005).

• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 38152/11

  STOYKOV c. BULGARIE

  Une telle enquête doit être « effective'dans le sens où elle doit permettre aux autorités de déterminer si le recours à la force était ou non justifié dans les circonstances particulières de l'espèce (Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 55, 24 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 8810/05

  DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA

  Bearing in mind the difficulties involved in policing modern societies, the unpredictability of human conduct and the operational choices which must be made in terms of priorities and resources, the Court has previously stated, particularly in the context of Article 2 of the Convention, that an impossible burden should not be imposed on the authorities when they have to face situations of disorder or violence capable of giving rise to unpredictable developments (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 69, ECHR 2004-XI, and Zelilof v. Greece, no. 17060/03, § 48, 24 May 2007).
• EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 39651/11

  POPOVI c. BULGARIE

  Une telle enquête doit être « effective'dans le sens où elle doit permettre aux autorités de déterminer si le recours à la force était ou non justifié dans les circonstances particulières de l'espèce (Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 55, 24 mai 2007).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 34805/02

  ANGEL VASKOV ANGELOV c. BULGARIE

  Une telle enquête doit être « effective'dans le sens où elle doit permettre aux autorités de déterminer si le recours à la force était ou non justifié dans les circonstances particulières de l'espèce (Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 55, 24 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 70555/10

  ION BALASOIU c. ROUMANIE

  Les autorités sont tenues par ailleurs de préserver et recueillir les preuves nécessaires à l'établissement des faits, qu'il s'agisse - par exemple - des dépositions de témoins ou des preuves matérielles (Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 56, 24 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 57123/08

  DIMCHO DIMOV c. BULGARIE

  Une telle enquête doit être « effective'dans le sens où elle doit permettre aux autorités de déterminer si le recours à la force était ou non justifié dans les circonstances particulières de l'espèce (Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 55, 24 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 33856/05

  BOBROV v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the applicant's description of the alleged ill-treatment was consistent throughout the proceedings and accordingly takes the view that the burden of proof rests on the authorities to account for the injuries at issue by providing a satisfactory and convincing explanation of their cause (see Zelilof v. Greece, no. 17060/03, § 44, 24 May 2007, and Polyakov, cited above, §§ 25-26) and to demonstrate that the use of force was not excessive (see, mutatis mutandis, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 104, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 13642/06

  RYABTSEV v. RUSSIA

  Taking into account the applicant's description of the alleged ill-treatment, which was credible and consistent throughout the proceedings, and the contents of the medical certificate of 29 March 2004, the Court takes the view that the burden of proof rested on the authorities to account for the injuries at issue by providing a satisfactory and convincing explanation of their cause (see Zelilof v. Greece, no. 17060/03, § 44, 24 May 2007, and Polyakov, cited above, §§ 25 and 26) and to demonstrate that in each case the use of force was not excessive (see, mutatis mutandis, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII, and Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 104, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 4390/03

  GHIGA CHIUJDEA c. ROUMANIE

  Les autorités sont tenues par ailleurs de préserver et recueillir les preuves nécessaires à l'établissement des faits, qu'il s'agisse - par exemple - des dépositions de témoins ou des preuves matérielles (voir l'arrêt Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 56, 24 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 60770/15

  GEORGIEV c. BULGARIE

  Une telle enquête doit être « effective ", dans le sens où elle doit permettre aux autorités de déterminer si le recours à la force était ou non justifié dans les circonstances particulières de l'espèce (Zelilof c. Grèce, no 17060/03, § 55, 24 mai 2007).
• EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 42660/11

  ANDERSEN c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 59793/08

  ZELIDIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 2945/07

  GALOTSKIN v. GREECE
• EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 77092/01

  NECDET BULUT v. TURKEY