Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IBRAHIMOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-b - Adequate ...

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  That right is of primary importance in a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A no. 12, and Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 37, Series A no. 33).
• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04

  KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  The Court reiterates that, although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II).

 
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  The quality of the evidence is also taken into account, including whether the circumstances in which it was obtained cast doubt on its reliability or accuracy (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 96, ECHR 2006-IX).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, and the Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was obtained and heard, were fair, in particular, whether the applicant was given the opportunity of challenging the evidence and of opposing its use; and whether the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms between the prosecution and the defence were respected (see Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 88, 90, 10 March 2009, and Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-II).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or of law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140, and Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, 9 June 1998, § 34, Reports 1998-IV).
• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

  POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  The Court will therefore examine the complaints under both provisions taken together (see, among many other authorities, F.C.B. v. Italy, 28 August 1991, § 29, Series A no. 208-B, and Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 29, Series A no. 277-A).
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95

  ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, and the Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was obtained and heard, were fair, in particular, whether the applicant was given the opportunity of challenging the evidence and of opposing its use; and whether the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms between the prosecution and the defence were respected (see Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 88, 90, 10 March 2009, and Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-II).
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08

  FÁBER v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2016 - 69234/11

  In particular, where irregular demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence, the Court has required that the public authorities show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings if the freedom of assembly guaranteed by Article 11 of the Convention is not to be deprived of all substance (see Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 34, ECHR 2007-III; Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 49, 24 July 2012; Malofeyeva, cited above, §§ 136-37; Kasparov and Others, cited above, § 91; and Kudrevicius and Others, cited above, §§ 147-154).
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04

  BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00

  MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06

  HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 12151/86

  F.C.B. c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 61821/00

  ZILIBERBERG v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 3653/05

  ASADBEYLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

• EGMR, 08.04.2021 - 47621/13

  Impfpflicht in Tschechien: Impflicht für Kinder ist keine …

  69234/11 and 2 others, § 80, 11 February 2016; Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 193-199, 23 February 2016; Bir?¾ietis v. Lithuania, no. 49304/09, § 58, 14 June 2016; Kry?¾evicius v. Lithuania, no. 67816/14, §§ 67-70, 11 December 2018; P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 1122/12, §§ 29-33, 26 May 2020; and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, §§ 152-159, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 35289/11

  REGNER c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  This Court has understood the proper administration of justice to require that judgments of courts and tribunals should adequately state the reasons on which they are based (see Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234/11 and 2 others, § 103, 11 February 2016, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 17184/18

  A AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 88-129, 11 February 2016, concerning Articles 5 and 6; Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, §§ 29-53, 24 November 2016, concerning Article 3; Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos.

 
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13

  MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE

  69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 126-27, 11 February 2016); or the authorities manipulate procedures to prolong the detention for the same purpose (see Navalnyy and Yashin, cited above, §§ 92-95), or to delay having to obtain judicial authorisation for the detention, as required under domestic law (see Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727/04, §§ 86-88, 24 June 2010), or to proceed with a disguised extradition (see Bozano v. France, cited above, §§ 59-60; Nowak v. Ukraine, no. 60846/10, § 58, 31 March 2011; Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, §§ 163 and 165, 18 April 2013; and Eshonkulov v. Russia, no. 68900/13, § 65, 15 January 2015); or the applicant is illegally abducted and surrendered to another State (see Iskandarov v. Russia, no. 17185/05, §§ 109-15 and 148-51, 23 September 2010); or the citizens of another State are indiscriminately arrested with a view to being deported en masse as a measure of reprisal (see Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, §§ 185-86, ECHR 2014 (extracts)) - the Court finds an absence of a legitimate ground for the deprivation of liberty and accordingly a breach of Article 5 § 1.
• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 26163/22

  AHMADLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  67360/11 and 2 others, 11 February 2016; Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 69234/11 and 2 others, 11 February 2016; Hajibeyli and Others v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos.
• EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 64937/19

  ELVAN c. TÜRKIYE

  Se référant à la jurisprudence pertinente de la Cour (Oya Ataman c. Turquie, no 74552/01, §§ 41-43, CEDH 2006-XIV, Izci c. Turquie, no 42606/05, § 99, 23 juillet 2013, 1brahimov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 69234/11 et 2 autres, § 80, 11 février 2016, Navalnyy c. Russie [GC], nos 29580/12 et 4 autres, § 134, 15 novembre 2018), le Gouvernement affirme qu'en l'espèce le recours à la force par les policiers était devenu absolument nécessaire en raison des agissements de certains manifestants sur les lieux de l'événement en cause, où, selon lui, plus de deux cents individus s'étaient regroupés vers 1 heure et avaient commencé à vandaliser des commerces.
• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 28232/22

  FIGURKA v. UKRAINE

  69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 97-101, 11 February 2016; and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 52286/11

  AHMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 93-115, 11 February 2016; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 71750/13

  BABAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  69234/11, 69252/11 and 69335/11, §§ 74-77, 11 February 2016; and Bayramov v. Azerbaijan [Committee], nos.
• EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 59202/12

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 93-115, 11 February 2016; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 5417/13

  ABBASLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 65910/14

  KHALILOVA AND AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN