Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DINCHEV v. BULGARIA

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 23057/03
• EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

  PEREZ c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  The Court notes at the outset that Article 6 § 1 does not guarantee the right to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence (see, among many other authorities, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

  KUTIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  It starts with the observation that the Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory, but rights that are practical and effective (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 15.07.2003 - 33400/96

  ERNST ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  In cases where the applicants had at their disposal accessible and effective avenues of redress, it found that their right of access to a court had not been infringed (see Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400/96, §§ 53-55, 15 July 2003; and Forum Maritime S.A. v. Romania, nos.

• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 56195/00

  KRUMPEL AND KRUMPELOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  Once he had opted for this remedy, he was entitled to have his claim determined and not required to try, for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, the other avenue of redress available under Bulgarian law (see Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 39-48, 5 July 2005).
• EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 54589/00

  ANAGNOSTOPOULOS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  However, in other cases the Court has found violations of Article 6 § 1 when the discontinuation of criminal proceedings and the resultant non-examination of civil-party claims lodged in their context were due to omissions by the authorities; in particular, excessive delays leading to the lapse of the limitation periods for criminal prosecution (see Anagnostopoulos v. Greece, no. 54589/00, §§ 31 and 32, 3 April 2003; and Gousis v. Greece, no. 8863/03, §§ 34 and 35, 29 March 2007).
• EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 39933/03

  BUONFARDIECI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  The Court has also held that the fact that proceedings are taking a long time does not concern access to a court (see Matos e Silva, Lda., and Others v. Portugal, 16 September 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-IV; and, more recently, Buonfardieci v. Italy (dec.), no. 39933/03, § 20, 18 December 2007).
• EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 8863/03

  GOUSIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2009 - 23057/03

  However, in other cases the Court has found violations of Article 6 § 1 when the discontinuation of criminal proceedings and the resultant non-examination of civil-party claims lodged in their context were due to omissions by the authorities; in particular, excessive delays leading to the lapse of the limitation periods for criminal prosecution (see Anagnostopoulos v. Greece, no. 54589/00, §§ 31 and 32, 3 April 2003; and Gousis v. Greece, no. 8863/03, §§ 34 and 35, 29 March 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 18527/02

  TONCHEV v. BULGARIA

  The law and practice concerning limitation periods for the prosecution of criminal offences have been described in paragraphs 27 and 28 of the Court's judgment in the recent case of Dinchev v. Bulgaria (no. 23057/03, 22 January 2009).