Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAJDANDZIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  The machinery of complaint to the Court is thus subsidiary to national systems safeguarding human rights (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01

  DUBJAKOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  The applicants" status of victims then depends on whether the redress afforded was adequate and sufficient having regard to just satisfaction as provided for under Article 41 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Dubjaková v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 67299/01, 19 October 2004).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 45656/99

  CATALDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  In the light of the material in the file and having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, the Court considers that the sum awarded to the applicants can be considered sufficient and therefore appropriate redress for the violation suffered (see Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, 3 June 2004, Sirancová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62216/00, 7 September 2004 and Kalajzic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 15382/04, 28 September 2006).

• EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 58112/00

  MULTIPLEX v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  Turning to the actual sum awarded to the applicants by the Constitutional Court, the Court notes that the compensation granted in the present case is lower compared with the sums awarded by the Court in similar cases (see, for example, Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, 10 July 2003 and Acimovic v. Croatia, no. 61237/00, ECHR 2003-XI).
• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 61237/00

  ACIMOVIC c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  Turning to the actual sum awarded to the applicants by the Constitutional Court, the Court notes that the compensation granted in the present case is lower compared with the sums awarded by the Court in similar cases (see, for example, Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, 10 July 2003 and Acimovic v. Croatia, no. 61237/00, ECHR 2003-XI).
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 15382/04

  KALAJZIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  In the light of the material in the file and having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, the Court considers that the sum awarded to the applicants can be considered sufficient and therefore appropriate redress for the violation suffered (see Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, 3 June 2004, Sirancová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62216/00, 7 September 2004 and Kalajzic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 15382/04, 28 September 2006).
• EGMR, 07.09.2004 - 62216/00

  SIRANCOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 2343/03

  In the light of the material in the file and having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, the Court considers that the sum awarded to the applicants can be considered sufficient and therefore appropriate redress for the violation suffered (see Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, 3 June 2004, Sirancová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62216/00, 7 September 2004 and Kalajzic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 15382/04, 28 September 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 44499/09

  BESEVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  2343/03 of 17 November 2003.