Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PETEK v. CROATIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07

  GHERGHINA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 50000/12

  The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, § 84, 9 July 2015).
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 31360/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 50000/12

  The Court has already held that complaints regarding a lack of fairness in proceedings are best addressed in the proceedings in connection with which such complaints are raised (see Tarbuk v. Croatia, no. 31360/10, § 33, 11 December 2012).
• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 46726/11

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 50000/12

  In several cases concerning Croatia the Court has already considered that applicants had properly exhausted domestic remedies by raising the same complaints they raised before the Court throughout the domestic proceedings, and that that was the normal use of the domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Tarbuk, cited above, § 32; Zrilić v. Croatia, no. 46726/11, §§ 46-48, 3 October 2013; Horvatić v. Croatia, no. 36044/09, § 70, 17 October 2013; and Marić v. Croatia, no. 50132/12, § 53, 12 June 2014).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.03.2023 - 18551/17

  GUCIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Applying the same principle, the Court has declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies a number of cases against Croatia in which the applicants had not raised their Convention grievances at the first opportunity or, at the latest, in their appeals, even though they had subsequently raised them in their constitutional complaints (see Ringwald v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 14590/15 and 25405/15, §§ 59-62, 22 January 2019; Leštek v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 18532/12, §§ 18-22, 20 February 2018; Bosanac v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 79580/12, §§ 18-21, 20 February 2018; and Petek v. Croatia (dec.) [Committee], no. 50000/12, §§ 17-21, 20 February 2018).