Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,25144
EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07 (https://dejure.org/2015,25144)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.09.2015 - 42219/07 (https://dejure.org/2015,25144)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. September 2015 - 42219/07 (https://dejure.org/2015,25144)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,25144) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

Sonstiges (2)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • NJW 2016, 3009
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (38)Neu Zitiert selbst (21)

  • EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 27677/02

    SENTGES v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    The Court once again reiterates in this connection that it is a fundamental principle that the protection machinery established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights, and this is especially true with regard to claims which, as in the present case, relate to matters of economic and social policy entailing public expenditure; States have limited resources, and the national authorities are, in principle, better placed than an international court to determine how they are to be allocated, taking into account local needs and conditions (see, mutatis mutandis, Mólka v. Poland (dec.), no. 56550/00, ECHR 2006-IV, and Sentges v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 27677/02, 8 July 2003).
  • EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

    CARDOT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    In conclusion, it considers that the applicant did not provide the national courts with the opportunity which is in principle intended to be afforded to Contracting States by Article 35 of the Convention, namely the opportunity to prevent or put right Convention violations through their own legal system (see, among other authorities, Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 72, Series A no. 39, and Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 36, Series A no. 200).
  • EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 56550/00

    MÓLKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    The Court once again reiterates in this connection that it is a fundamental principle that the protection machinery established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights, and this is especially true with regard to claims which, as in the present case, relate to matters of economic and social policy entailing public expenditure; States have limited resources, and the national authorities are, in principle, better placed than an international court to determine how they are to be allocated, taking into account local needs and conditions (see, mutatis mutandis, Mólka v. Poland (dec.), no. 56550/00, ECHR 2006-IV, and Sentges v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 27677/02, 8 July 2003).
     
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

    GUZZARDI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    In conclusion, it considers that the applicant did not provide the national courts with the opportunity which is in principle intended to be afforded to Contracting States by Article 35 of the Convention, namely the opportunity to prevent or put right Convention violations through their own legal system (see, among other authorities, Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 72, Series A no. 39, and Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 36, Series A no. 200).
  • EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

    McFARLANE v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    The availability of a remedy said to exist, including its scope and application, must be clearly set out and confirmed or complemented by practice or case-law (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, §§ 117 and 120, 10 September 2010, and Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 34, 18 January 2011).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02
    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010; and Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 77).
  • EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 13099/04

    LAUTARU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    Citing in particular the cases of Di Sarno and Others v. Italy (no. 30765/08, 10 January 2012), orđevic v. Croatia (no. 41526/10, ECHR 2012) and Lautaru v. Romania (no. 13099/04, 18 October 2011), he submitted that the Court had already held that the mere possibility of obtaining financial compensation was not sufficient in itself to afford appropriate redress where applicants were seeking to put a stop to particular conduct.
  • EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 6778/05

    MPP GOLUB c. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    The Court reiterates that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to make use of that remedy (see, for example, Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 37, Series A no. 40, and MPP Golub v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 6778/05, ECHR 2005-XI).
  • EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

    Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    Such case-law must in principle be well established and date back to the period before the application was lodged (see, among other authorities, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 110, ECHR 2006-VII; Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599/05, § 115, 22 October 2009; and Zutter v. France (dec.), no. 197/96, 27 June 2000), subject to exceptions which may be justified by the particular circumstances of the case.
  • EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99

    BALOGH v. HUNGARY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07
    To be effective, a remedy must be capable of remedying directly the impugned state of affairs and must offer reasonable prospects of success (see Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II; Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 74; and Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004).
  • EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

    RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  • EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 17599/05

    NORBERT SIKORSKI c. POLOGNE

  • EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

    Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  • EGMR - 19993/04

    [ENG]

  • RG, 24.10.1896 - I 197/96

    Rückforderung des auf Grund eines wider die Ehrbarkeit laufenden Vertrages zu …

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 30765/08

    Di Sarno u.a. ./. Italien

  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

    VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR - 10200/04

    [ENG]

  • EGMR - 21819/04

    [ENG]

  • EGMR - 13466/03

    [ENG]

  • EGMR - 14163/04

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 19.12.2018 - 20452/14

    MOLLA SALI v. GREECE

    The Court also reiterates that it is incumbent on the Government pleading non-exhaustion to satisfy it that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say that it was accessible, was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see, in particular, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II; Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014, and Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 4782/18

    Österreich verurteilt: Vorwürfe eines KZ-Überlebenden nicht geprüft

    To be effective, a remedy must be capable of remedying directly the impugned state of affairs and must offer reasonable prospects of success (see Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015, with further references).
  • EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 24159/22

    GU?MUNDUR GUNNARSSON AND MAGN?S DAV?? NOR?DAHL v. ICELAND

    The availability of a remedy said to exist, including its scope and application, must be clearly set out and confirmed or complemented by practice or case-law, which must in principle be well established and date back to the period before the application was lodged, subject to exceptions which may be justified by the particular circumstances of the case (see Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, § 88, 9 July 2015, with further references).
     
  • EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 54507/21

    IBOKO LOKILA c. FRANCE

    La Cour rappelle, d'une part, que la logique qui sous-tend la règle de l'épuisement des voies de recours internes est de ménager aux autorités nationales, et avant tout aux tribunaux, l'occasion de prévenir ou de redresser les violations alléguées de la Convention et, d'autre part, qu'il faut appliquer la règle de l'épuisement des recours internes avec une certaine souplesse et sans formalisme excessif (voir Gherghina c. Roumanie (déc.) [GC], no 42219/07, §§ 84-89, 7 juillet 2015).
  • EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 55989/20

    B.D. c. FRANCE

    La Cour rappelle, d'une part, que la logique qui sous-tend la règle de l'épuisement des voies de recours internes est de ménager aux autorités nationales, et avant tout aux tribunaux, l'occasion de prévenir ou de redresser les violations alléguées de la Convention et, d'autre part, qu'il faut appliquer la règle de l'épuisement des recours internes avec une certaine souplesse et sans formalisme excessif (voir Gherghina c. Roumanie (déc.) [GC], no 42219/07, §§ 84-89, 7 juillet 2015).
  • EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 6281/13

    Verurteilte Gewalttäter: Regeln zur Sicherungsverwahrung bestätigt

    Ein Beschwerdeführer muss Zugang zu den nach der innerstaatlichen Rechtsordnung zur Verfügung stehenden Rechtsbehelfen haben, die in Bezug auf die behauptete Konventionsverletzung wirksam sind (…siehe Akdivar, a. a. O. Rdnrn. 65-67, und Gherghina./. Rumänien (Entsch.) [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 42219/07, Rdnr. 85, 9.
  • EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 81114/17

    ÁDÁM AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

    On the requirement to exhaust domestic remedies, the Court refers to the well-established principles of its case-law (as reiterated notably in Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, §§ 83-89, 9 July 2015, and Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos.

    In a legal system in which fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution and the law, it is incumbent on the aggrieved individual to test the extent of that protection and allow the domestic courts to apply those rights and, where appropriate, develop them in exercising their power of interpretation (see, mutatis mutandis, A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 142, ECHR 2010, and Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, § 101, 9 July 2015).

  • EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 46033/21

    A.K. c. FRANCE

    La Cour rappelle, d'une part, que la logique qui sous-tend la règle de l'épuisement des voies de recours internes est de ménager aux autorités nationales, et avant tout aux tribunaux, l'occasion de prévenir ou de redresser les violations alléguées de la Convention et, d'autre part, qu'il faut appliquer la règle de l'épuisement des recours internes avec une certaine souplesse et sans formalisme excessif (voir Gherghina c. Roumanie (déc.) [GC], no 42219/07, §§ 84-89, 7 juillet 2015).
  • EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 22597/16

    R.B. v. ESTONIA

    However, there is no obligation to have recourse to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (see Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, §§ 85-86, 9 July 2015, and the references therein).

    The rationale for the exhaustion rule is to afford the national authorities, primarily the courts, the opportunity to put right, to the extent possible, the alleged violations of the Convention (see the summary of the principles in Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, §§ 84-89, 9 July 2015; Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos.

  • EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 47108/08

    ALBA GAMES AND BITI v. ALBANIA

    The general principles on exhaustion of domestic remedies have been summarised in Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia ([GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014, and Gherghina v. Romania ((dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, §§ 83-89, 9 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 31.03.2016 - 50346/07

    DIMITAR YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  • EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 53162/21

    DIACONEASA v. ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

    GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  • EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 35614/19

    ILERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE

  • EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 56665/09

    KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY

  • EGMR, 29.06.2017 - 20086/13

    KOSMAS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

  • EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

    RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA

  • EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 37031/21

    I.V. v. ESTONIA

  • EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 36705/16

    MARGARI v. GREECE

  • EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 2303/19

    KATSIKEROS v. GREECE

  • EGMR, 31.10.2019 - 4762/18

    PAPAGEORGIOU AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  • EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 1122/12

    P.T. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 22200/10

    VARDANEAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 2082/05

    AYDIN ÇETINKAYA v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 13.04.2023 - 66015/17

    JÍROVÁ AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  • EGMR, 07.02.2023 - 228/20

    OSAGIEDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 40825/15

    ALEKSIC v. SERBIA

  • EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 32617/16

    APOPII v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

    MUSTAFA SEZGIN TANRIKULU v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 9662/13

    TSONEV v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 13463/07

    APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 59963/21

    ZANOLA v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 17218/17

    VANGELOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  • EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 15361/10

    KOMTEKH-PLUS, PF NVP v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 35427/15

    ORUÇ c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 17.09.2020 - 62775/14

    MIRGADIROV v. AZERBAIJAN AND TURKEY

  • EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 4550/15

    SAURE v. GERMANY

  • EGMR, 07.09.2021 - 36027/19

    DADUSENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht