Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUSTAFA SEZGIN TANRIKULU v. TURKEY

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  The Court has already examined similar requirements in the past and found that such an identification could be made by names, addresses, telephone numbers or other relevant information (see Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, § 80, 28 June 2007; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, §§ 64 and 65 1 July 2008; Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 51, Series A no. 28; Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, § 160, 18 May 2010; and see Roman Zakharov, § 264, cited above).
• EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 54934/00

  Menschenrechte: Verletzung der Privatsphäre und des Briefgeheimnisses durch das …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  The Court cannot question the national courts" interpretation, except in the event of flagrant non-observance or arbitrariness in the application of the domestic legislation in question (see, mutatis mutandis, Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, § 90, ECHR 2006-XI; Anheuser Busch Inc.
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  With regard to the general principles related to the interception of communications, the Court refers to its judgment in Roman Zakharov v. Russia ([GC], no. 47143/06, §§ 227-235, ECHR 2015), and references therein).

 
• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  That conclusion removes the need for the Court to examine further the content of the other guarantees required by Article 8 § 2 (Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 82, Series A no. 82).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  The availability of a remedy said to exist, including its scope and application, must be clearly set out and confirmed or complemented by practice or case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 219, ECHR 2012; and Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, § 88, 9 July 2015).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  However, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law only in respect of an alleged grievance which is an arguable one in terms of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).
• EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07

  GHERGHINA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  The availability of a remedy said to exist, including its scope and application, must be clearly set out and confirmed or complemented by practice or case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 219, ECHR 2012; and Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, § 88, 9 July 2015).
• EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 9208/05

  LACHOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007-I; Goranova-Karaeneva, cited above, § 46; and Lachowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 9208/05, 6 May 2014).

• EGMR, 13.09.2018 - 58170/13

  Big Brother Watch u.a./United Kingdom - Massenhafte Überwachung von Kommunikation

  24 Mustafa Sezgin Tanrikulu v. Turkey, no. 27473/06, 18 July 2017.25 Roman Zakharov, cited above, §§ 231 and 264.26 Ibid., §§ 175-178.27 Ibid., §§ 31, 246-248.
• EGMR, 25.05.2021 - 58170/13

  BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  [32] Mustafa Sezgin Tanrikulu v. Turkey, no. 27473/06, 18 July 2017.
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 70078/12

  EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  It was for the Government to explain that point, and as far as possible support their explanations with concrete examples (see, mutatis mutandis, Roman Zakharov, cited above, § 295, and Mustafa Sezgin Tanrikulu v. Turkey, no. 27473/06, §§ 28-29, 18 July 2017).