Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,13211) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OSSO v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
OSSO v. BULGARIA
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 66997/13
ANEVA AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
Having regard to the nature of the violation found and making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court awards the applicant EUR 15, 000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant (compare with Aneva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 66997/13 and 2 others, § 132, 6 April 2017, and A and Others v. Bulgaria [Committee], no. 28383/20, § 29, 9 May 2023). - EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 1714/10
FERRARI v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
Effective respect for family life requires that future relations between parent and child not be determined by the mere effluxion of time (see, among many others, Ferrari v. Romania, no. 1714/10, § 53, 28 April 2015). - EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 28383/20
A AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
Having regard to the nature of the violation found and making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court awards the applicant EUR 15, 000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant (compare with Aneva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 66997/13 and 2 others, § 132, 6 April 2017, and A and Others v. Bulgaria [Committee], no. 28383/20, § 29, 9 May 2023).
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 54443/10
BLAGA v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
The Court has previously found similar or even shorter periods to be excessively long (see G.N. v. Poland, cited above, §§ 66-68 - seventeen months and two weeks; Blaga v. Romania, no. 54443/10, § 83, 1 July 2014 - almost fourteen months; K.J. v. Poland, cited above, §§ 71-72 - twelve months; and R.S. v. Poland, no. 63777/09, § 70, 21 July 2015 - over six months). - EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06
CASES OF FINGER, DIMITROV AND HAMANOV AND 54 OTHER CASES AGAINST BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
Also, a request for fixing of time-limit could not provide effective redress in respect of delays resulting from courts' own failure to organise proper examination of the case, or in situations in which the proceedings had lasted too long without there being identifiable periods of inactivity (see Deyanov v. Bulgaria, no. 2930/04, §§ 69-70, 30 September 2010). - EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 2171/14
G.N. v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
The Court is unaware either of any attempts of the Swiss authorities to apprehend G.O. Nothing indicated that she would not have access to effective legal remedies there, were she to need them, and to proper defence to ensure the protection of her interests and those of L. (see G.N. v. Poland, no. 2171/14, § 64, 19 July 2016). - EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 30813/14
K.J. v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
The Court reiterates that the "grave risk exception" cannot arise solely from the child's separation from the parent responsible for the wrongful removal (see K.J. v. Poland, no. 30813/14, § 67, 1 March 2016). - EGMR, 18.06.2019 - 15122/17
USHAKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
The SCA's decision was not sufficiently reasoned as regards the factors capable of constituting an exception to the child's immediate return, so as to enable the Court to ascertain that those questions were genuinely and effectively examined (see Vladimir Ushakov v. Russia, no. 15122/17, § 82, 18 June 2019). - EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 36048/17
THOMPSON v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
Allowing the return mechanism to be automatically deactivated on the sole basis of a refusal by the abducting parent to return would subject the system designed by the Hague Convention to the unilateral will of that parent (see Thompson v. Russia, no. 36048/17, § 70, 30 March 2021). - EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 2361/13
SMIRNOVA v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2023 - 51056/21
Principles about the promptness of proceedings have been outlined in G.S. v. Georgia (no. 2361/13, § 49, 21 July 2015, with further references).
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.