Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OCHLIK v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (12)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  In particular, it considered that it was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 36-42).
• EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 92/03

  PISK-PISKOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  The Court has held on many occasions that as long as the Polish authorities continue the practice of marking detainees" letters with the "censored" stamp, the Court has no alternative but to presume that those letters have been opened and their contents read (see Matwiejczuk v. Poland, no. 37641/97, § 99, 2 December 2003; Pisk-Piskowski v. Poland, no. 92/03, § 26, 14 June 2005; and Michta, cited above, § 58).
• EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97

  MATWIEJCZUK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  The Court has held on many occasions that as long as the Polish authorities continue the practice of marking detainees" letters with the "censored" stamp, the Court has no alternative but to presume that those letters have been opened and their contents read (see Matwiejczuk v. Poland, no. 37641/97, § 99, 2 December 2003; Pisk-Piskowski v. Poland, no. 92/03, § 26, 14 June 2005; and Michta, cited above, § 58).

• EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 51895/99

  KWIEK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  Accordingly, the prohibition of censorship of correspondence with the European Court of Human Rights contained in Article 103 of the same Code, which expressly relates to convicted persons, was also applicable to detained persons (see Michta, cited above, § 61, and Kwiek v. Poland, no. 51895/99, § 44, 30 May 2006).
• EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 21890/03

  LEWAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  For these reasons, the Government's plea of inadmissibility on the ground of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies must be dismissed (see Lewak v. Poland, no. 21890/03, § 26, 6 September 2007).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  The Court reiterates that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial", as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, have been set out in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI, and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  Any relevance that the latter judgment might possibly have in respect of the present case is therefore reduced by the fact that it was given after the relevant time (see, for example, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX).
• KAG Mainz, 25.11.2010 - M 29/10

  Höhergruppierung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  29/10/2008.
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04

  CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of pre-trial detention (aresztowanie tymczasowe), the grounds for its extension, release from detention and rules governing other "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are set out in the Court's judgments in the cases of Golek v. Poland, no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006 and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006.
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 57477/00

  MALIK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 8260/04

  It does not appear therefore that his case presented particular difficulties for the investigation authorities and for the courts to determine the facts and mount a case against the perpetrator, as would undoubtedly have been the case had the proceedings concerned organised crime (see Celejewski, cited above, § 37, and Malik v. Poland, no. 57477/00, § 49, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 67016/01

  DUDA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 38227/02

  HARAZIN v. POLAND

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96

  KLAMECKI ET 57 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE

  8260/04.