Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOSHELEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 34 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Kosheleva and Others v. Russia

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07
• EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 9046/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10

  Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  12/10/1973.
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05

  GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  11/05/1958.
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02

  LIGERES v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  17/02/1932.

• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 11/04

  VOTTO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  11/04/1937.
• KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  11/06/1942.
• VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02

  Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  18/02/1941.
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  In this context, "pressure" includes not only direct coercion and flagrant acts of intimidation but also other improper indirect acts or contacts designed to dissuade or discourage applicants from pursuing a Convention remedy (see Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 160, Reports 1998-III, and Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 130, ECHR 1999-IV, with further references).
• EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 14330/07

  BELKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  The Court considers the period of the enforcement to be reasonable and well within the standards set in its established case-law (see Belkin and Others v. Russia, nos. 14330/07 et al, 5 February 2009).
• EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 31242/05

  VLADIMIR SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  The Court has acknowledged before that not every inquiry by the authorities on an application pending before the Court can be regarded as "intimidation" and that Article 34 does not prevent the State from taking measures in order to improve the applicant's situation or even from solving the problem which is at the heart of the Strasbourg proceedings (see Vladimir Sokolov v. Russia, no. 31242/05, § 81, 29 March 2011).
• EGMR, 08.02.2000 - 25878/94

  MICHAEL EDWARD COOKE v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9046/07

  The Court observes at the outset that a complaint under Article 34 of the Convention is of a procedural nature and therefore does not give rise to any issue of admissibility under the Convention (see Cooke v. Austria, no. 25878/94, § 46, 8 February 2000, and Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 105, Reports 1998-IV).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen