Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YELISEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  The expression "any form of pressure" must be taken to cover not only direct coercion and flagrant acts of intimidation of applicants or their legal representatives but also other improper indirect acts or contacts designed to dissuade or discourage them from pursuing a Convention remedy or having a "chilling effect" on the exercise of the right of individual petition by applicants and their representatives (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 130, ECHR 1999-IV; McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, § 151, 28 May 2002; and Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/01, §§ 48-51, 13 April 2006).
• EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 73225/01

  Gesetzlicher Richter gemäß Art. 6 EMRK (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren; Besetzung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  The expression "any form of pressure" must be taken to cover not only direct coercion and flagrant acts of intimidation of applicants or their legal representatives but also other improper indirect acts or contacts designed to dissuade or discourage them from pursuing a Convention remedy or having a "chilling effect" on the exercise of the right of individual petition by applicants and their representatives (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 130, ECHR 1999-IV; McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, § 151, 28 May 2002; and Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/01, §§ 48-51, 13 April 2006).
• EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 152/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  In such circumstances the Court finds that the national authorities made the necessary steps in order not only to discipline the persons responsible for the breach of the applicants' right, but also to put in place a framework for avoiding in the future any unjustified "chilling" effect on the effective exercise of a right of individual application before the Court (see, by contrast, Nurmagomedov v. Russia, no. 30138/02, § 61, 7 June 2007; and Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152/04, § 164, 12 February 2013).

• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 46744/07

  CHARALAMBOUS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  46744/07, 16622/08, 29673/08, 37368/08, 45656/08, 4584/10, 4649/10, 4852/05, 5189/10, 5210/08, 5247/08, 5270/08, 5277/08, 5281/08, 59490/09, 60676/08, 60678/08, 60688/08, 60696/08, 60719/08, 60734/08, 60742/08, 60771/08, 6081/10, 7048/08, 7086/08, 7439/08, 7512/08, 7839/10, § 74, 3 April 2012).
• EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 43290/98

  McSHANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  The expression "any form of pressure" must be taken to cover not only direct coercion and flagrant acts of intimidation of applicants or their legal representatives but also other improper indirect acts or contacts designed to dissuade or discourage them from pursuing a Convention remedy or having a "chilling effect" on the exercise of the right of individual petition by applicants and their representatives (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 130, ECHR 1999-IV; McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, § 151, 28 May 2002; and Fedotova v. Russia, no. 73225/01, §§ 48-51, 13 April 2006).
• EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 46082/99

  KLYAKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  The opening of letters by prison authorities can therefore hinder applicants in bringing their cases to the Court, precisely by producing this "chilling effect" (see Klyakhin v. Russia, no. 46082/99, §§ 118 and 119, 30 November 2004; Belyaev and Digtyar v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 43231/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 923/03

  16984/04 and 9947/05, § 61, 16 February 2012; and Kopanitsyn v. Russia, no. 43231/04, § 43, 12 March 2015).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen