Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 3352/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,50392) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DERKACH v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00
BURDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 3352/05
Having regard to the content of the judgment of 25 November 2005, the applicant's unwillingness to appeal against it and the fact that it was enforced within a relatively short period of time which did not impair the essence of the applicant's right to a court (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 33-42, ECHR 2002-III; Grishchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 75907/01, 8 July 2004; Denisov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 18512/02, 1 February 2005; Presnyakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 41145/02, 10 November 2005), the Court finds that the national authorities have acknowledged and then afforded redress for the alleged breach of the Convention. - EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 75907/01
GRISHCHENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 3352/05
Having regard to the content of the judgment of 25 November 2005, the applicant's unwillingness to appeal against it and the fact that it was enforced within a relatively short period of time which did not impair the essence of the applicant's right to a court (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 33-42, ECHR 2002-III; Grishchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 75907/01, 8 July 2004; Denisov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 18512/02, 1 February 2005; Presnyakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 41145/02, 10 November 2005), the Court finds that the national authorities have acknowledged and then afforded redress for the alleged breach of the Convention. - EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 41145/02
PRESNYAKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 3352/05
Having regard to the content of the judgment of 25 November 2005, the applicant's unwillingness to appeal against it and the fact that it was enforced within a relatively short period of time which did not impair the essence of the applicant's right to a court (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 33-42, ECHR 2002-III; Grishchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 75907/01, 8 July 2004; Denisov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 18512/02, 1 February 2005; Presnyakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 41145/02, 10 November 2005), the Court finds that the national authorities have acknowledged and then afforded redress for the alleged breach of the Convention. - EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 18512/02
DENISOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 3352/05
Having regard to the content of the judgment of 25 November 2005, the applicant's unwillingness to appeal against it and the fact that it was enforced within a relatively short period of time which did not impair the essence of the applicant's right to a court (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 33-42, ECHR 2002-III; Grishchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 75907/01, 8 July 2004; Denisov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 18512/02, 1 February 2005; Presnyakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 41145/02, 10 November 2005), the Court finds that the national authorities have acknowledged and then afforded redress for the alleged breach of the Convention.