Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.07.1997 - 17849/91 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE (ARTICLE 50)
Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 1, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
Radiation du rôle Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 06.09.1993 - 17849/91
- EKMR, 04.07.1994 - 17849/91
- EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
- EGMR, 03.07.1997 - 17849/91
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.1997 - 17849/91
It originated in an application (no. 17849/91) against the Kingdom of Belgium lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by twenty-six applicants on 4 January 1991 (see the principal judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 8, para. 6).In its aforementioned judgment of 20 November 1995 ("the principal judgment"), the Court found that there had been deprivation of property contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) in that an Act of 30 August 1988 ("the 1988 Act") had retrospectively extinguished without consideration any claims for compensation which the applicants may have had against the Belgian State or against private companies offering pilot services for casualties occurring before 17 September 1988 (Series A no. 332, pp. 24 and 26, para. 44 and point 3 of the operative provisions).
- EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14556/89
PAPAMICHALOPOULOS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.1997 - 17849/91
The Court notes, however, that in the Papamichalopoulos and Others case it had previously found that each of the applicants had been expropriated in a manner incompatible with their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions (see judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 260-B, pp. 68-71, paras. 35-46, and points 1-2 of the operative provisions). - EGMR, 03.07.1997 - 38/1994/485/567
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.1997 - 17849/91
[1] The case is numbered 38/1994/485/567.