Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 74444/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,52886) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NASTASE v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NASTASE v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88
POITRIMOL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 74444/11
In the light of the foregoing, and since the instant case did not concern a defendant who had not received the summons to appear (see, for instance, Colozza v. Italy, 12 February 1985, § 28, Series A no. 89, or who had been denied the assistance of a lawyer (see, for example, Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, §§ 32-38, Series A no. 277-A) the Court considers that, regard being had to the margin of appreciation allowed to the Moldovan authorities, the applicant's conviction in absentia and the refusal to grant him a retrial at which he would be present did not amount to a disproportionate penalty (see Medenica, cited above, § 59). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 74444/11
Furthermore, it must not run counter to any important public interest (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A).