Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 32806/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,12033) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EGIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Egic v. Croatia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 32806/09
- EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 32806/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88
POITRIMOL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 32806/09
However, where such courts do exist, the guarantees of Article 6 must be complied with, for instance in that it guarantees to litigants an effective right of access to the courts for the determination of their "civil rights and obligations" (see, among many other authorities, Levages Prestations Services v. France, 23 October 1996, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, and Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, §§ 13-15, Series A no. 277-A). - EGMR, 26.07.2002 - 32911/96
MEFTAH AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 32806/09
Given the special nature of the role of cassation courts, which is limited to reviewing whether the law has been correctly applied, the Court is able to accept that the procedure followed in such courts may be more formal (see Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-VII). - EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97
GARCÍA MANIBARDO c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.06.2014 - 32806/09
The "right to a court", of which the right of access is one aspect, is not absolute; it is subject to limitations permitted by implication, in particular where the conditions of admissibility of an appeal are concerned, since by its very nature it calls for regulation by the State, which enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in this regard (see, for example, García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36, ECHR 2000-II, and Mortier v. France, no. 42195/98, § 33, 31 July 2001).