|EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 26860/11|
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KRASNODÄBSKA-KAZIKOWSKA AND LUNIEWSKA v. POLAND
No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
- EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 15090/08
SKENDERI AND OTHERS v. SERBIAWhat the Court needs to ascertain in each given case is whether the nature of the time-limit in question and/or the manner in which it was applied is compatible with the Convention requirements (see, mutatis mutandis, Vrbica v. Croatia, no. 32540/05, § 66, 1 April 2010, as well as the authorities cited therein, in the context of Article 6 of the Convention; see also, mutatis mutandis, Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and Luniewska v. Poland, no. 26860/11, §§ 46-51, 6 October 2015, in the context of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
- EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 50200/13
VIJATOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 20177/13
CH?ÂAPOWSKA-TRZECIAK v. POLANDIn the Court's view, even assuming that those decisions were sufficient to give rise to such a "proprietary interest" (see, mutatis mutandis, Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and ?uniewska v. Poland, no. 26860/11, § 31, 6 October 2015) this part of the application is in any event inadmissible for the following reasons.
- EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 4830/14
RACZY?SKA AND PALI?SKA v. POLANDExamples of the Supreme Court's case-law concerning compensation claims relating to administrative decisions are described in the judgment of Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and Luniewska v. Poland (no. 26860/11, §§ 25-27 October 2015).
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.