Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 07.04.2011 - 16443/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56969) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KALYUZHNA v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2011 - 16443/07
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, e.g., Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 33158/96
LAINO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2011 - 16443/07
Having regard to the findings in the paragraphs 21-26 above, the Court concludes that this complaint must be declared admissible, but that it is not necessary to examine it on the merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Laino v. Italy [GC], no. 33158/96, §§ 23-25, ECHR 1999-I, and S.C. Prodcomexim SRL v. Romania (no. 2), no. 31760/06, § 48, 6 July 2010). - EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 31760/06
S.C. PRODCOMEXIM S.R.L. v. ROMANIA (no. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.04.2011 - 16443/07
Having regard to the findings in the paragraphs 21-26 above, the Court concludes that this complaint must be declared admissible, but that it is not necessary to examine it on the merits (see, mutatis mutandis, Laino v. Italy [GC], no. 33158/96, §§ 23-25, ECHR 1999-I, and S.C. Prodcomexim SRL v. Romania (no. 2), no. 31760/06, § 48, 6 July 2010).