Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 30853/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62132) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHAPOSHNIKOV v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 30853/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 70767/01
PAVLYULYNETS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 30853/04
The Court reiterates that it can take into account only those periods when the case was actually pending before the courts, thus excluding from calculation those periods between the adoption of the final and binding judgments and their revocation in the course of the extraordinary proceedings (see Markin v. Russia (dec.), no. 59502/00, 16 September 2004, and Pavlyulynets v. Ukraine, no. 70767/01, §§ 41-42, 6 September 2005). - EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 21287/02
PRYSTAVSKA contre l'UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 30853/04
In such circumstances, the recourse to the Supreme Court to challenge proceedings which had been brought to an end by a final decision must be seen as akin to a request to reopen those proceedings by means of the extraordinary transitional remedy provided for by the Law of 21 June 2001 (see Prystavska v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21287/02, ECHR 2002-X).