Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 39561/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,66189) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LIS v. POLAND
N/A MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 39561/03
In this respect, the Court reiterates that it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court or to substitute its own assessment for that of the national courts or other national authorities unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see, among other authorities, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00
BURDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 39561/03
The Court further observes that a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III, Kukalo v. Russia, no. 63995/00, §§ 51-52, 3 November 2005). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 39561/03
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland (no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland (no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII) and judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V). - EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 63995/00
KUKALO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 39561/03
The Court further observes that a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III, Kukalo v. Russia, no. 63995/00, §§ 51-52, 3 November 2005). - EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 703/02
SHILOV AND BAYKOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2009 - 39561/03
It further considers that the enforcement of a judgment for extensive repairs may take longer than payment of a sum of money (see, mutatis mutandis, Shilov and Baykova v. Russia, no. 703/02, §§ 21-26, 29 June 2006).