Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VEGIYEV v. UKRAINE

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 37454/12

  46113/99 and 7 others, § 69, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 37454/12

  The purpose of that requirement is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity to prevent or put right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 01.04.2004 - 50357/99

  CAMBERROW MM5 AD v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 37454/12

  Complaints which have as their source specific events which occurred on identifiable dates cannot be construed as referring to a continuing situation, even if those events had enduring effects for the applicant (see Camberrow MM5 AD v. Bulgaria, (dec.), no. 50357/99, 1 April 2004, and Meltex Ltd v. Armenia (dec.), no. 37780/02, 27 May 2008).

 
• EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 14881/04

  FERNIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 37454/12

  An applicant cannot extend the strict time-limit imposed under the Convention by seeking to make inappropriate or misconceived applications to bodies or institutions which have no power or competence to offer effective redress for the complaint in issue under the Convention (see, for example, Fernie v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14881/04, 5 January 2006, and Lelyuk v. Ukraine, no. 24037/08, § 30, 17 November 2016).
• EGMR, 17.11.2016 - 24037/08

  LELYUK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 37454/12

  An applicant cannot extend the strict time-limit imposed under the Convention by seeking to make inappropriate or misconceived applications to bodies or institutions which have no power or competence to offer effective redress for the complaint in issue under the Convention (see, for example, Fernie v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14881/04, 5 January 2006, and Lelyuk v. Ukraine, no. 24037/08, § 30, 17 November 2016).
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 37780/02

  MELTEX LTD v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 37454/12

  Complaints which have as their source specific events which occurred on identifiable dates cannot be construed as referring to a continuing situation, even if those events had enduring effects for the applicant (see Camberrow MM5 AD v. Bulgaria, (dec.), no. 50357/99, 1 April 2004, and Meltex Ltd v. Armenia (dec.), no. 37780/02, 27 May 2008).