Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 41477/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,31178) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SCHWICKERATH v. GERMANY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 41477/98
In applications against Germany concerning the alleged unfairness of proceedings or the issue of control of correspondence, a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court is an effective remedy to be exhausted for the purposes of Articleï? 35 § 1 of the Convention (cf., mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Klass and Others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, pp. 8-9, §§ 11-13; Hennings v. Germany judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 9, § 18). - EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 41477/98
In applications against Germany concerning the alleged unfairness of proceedings or the issue of control of correspondence, a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court is an effective remedy to be exhausted for the purposes of Articleï? 35 § 1 of the Convention (cf., mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Klass and Others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, pp. 8-9, §§ 11-13; Hennings v. Germany judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 9, § 18).