Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2243/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,15466) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CURMI v. MALTA
Art. 41 MRK
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2243/10
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2243/10
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 2243/10
In such cases, in determining the amount of adequate compensation the Court must base itself on the criteria laid down in its judgments regarding Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, according to which a deprivation of property without payment of an amount reasonably related to its value would normally constitute a disproportionate interference which could not be considered justifiable under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 54, Series A no. 98), and a total lack of compensation may be considered justifiable only in exceptional circumstances.
- EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 48754/11
PLACÌ v. ITALY
The Court reiterates that the role of Article 6 § 1 in relation to Article 13 is that of a lex specialis, the requirements of Article 13 being subsumed by the more stringent requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see, for example, Société Anonyme Thaleia Karydi Axte v. Greece, no. 44769/07, § 29, 5 November 2009; Dauti v. Albania, no. 19206/05, § 58; 3 February 2009; Jafarli and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 36079/06, § 55, 29 July 2010; and Curmi v. Malta, no. 2243/10, § 58, 22 November 2011).