Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PEREK v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.09.2008 - 37021/05

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII.

• EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 36596/09

  GÜNAY v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that an applicant's failure to submit written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case or other information or documents requested by the Court may warrant the conclusion that he or she does not intend to pursue the application (see, inter alia, Perek v. Poland (dec.), no. 37021/05, 9 September 2008, and Ay v. Germany (dec.), no. 12851/12, 23 September 2014).
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 75407/10

  UZUN v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that an applicant's failure to submit written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case or other information or documents requested by the Court may warrant the conclusion that he or she does not intend to pursue the application (see, inter alia, Perek v. Poland (dec.), no. 37021/05, 9 September 2008, and Ay v. Germany (dec.), no. 12851/12, 23 September 2014).
• EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 9881/07

  ORTAÇ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that an applicant's failure to submit written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case or other information or documents requested by the Court may warrant the conclusion that he or she does not intend to pursue the application (see, inter alia, Perek v. Poland (dec.), no. 37021/05, 9 September 2008, and Ay v. Germany (dec.), no. 12851/12, 23 September 2014).
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 12061/09

  AGGÖZ v. TURKEY

  The Court reiterates that an applicant's failure to submit written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case or other information or documents requested by the Court may warrant the conclusion that he or she does not intend to pursue the application (see, inter alia, Ay v. Germany (dec.), no. 12851/12, 23 September 2014 and Perek v. Poland (dec.), no. 37021/05, 9 September 2008).
• EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 12851/12

  AY v. GERMANY

  Der Gerichtshof weist erneut darauf hin, dass der Umstand, dass ein Beschwerdeführer keine schriftliche Stellungnahme zur Zulässigkeit und Begründetheit der Rechtssache abgibt oder sonstige vom Gerichtshof angeforderte Informationen oder Unterlagen nicht vorlegt, den Schluss rechtfertigen kann, dass er die Beschwerde nicht weiterzuverfolgen beabsichtigt (siehe u.a. O../. Deutschland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 9643/04, 7. Dezember 2010; Perek./. Polen (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 37021/05, 9. September 2008; und Z../. Deutschland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 35866/03, 20. Februar 2007).