Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 2352/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,38598) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HOLDING AND BARNES PLC contre le ROYAUME-UNI
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HOLDING AND BARNES PLC v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 2352/02
However, as was explained in the Court's Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium judgment (10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, § 29), even where an adjudicatory body determining disputes over "civil rights and obligations" does not comply with Article 6 § 1 in some respect, no violation of the Convention can be found if the proceedings before that body are "subject to subsequent control by a judicial body that has full jurisdiction and does provide the guarantees of Article 6 § 1".
- EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 60860/00
TSFAYO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Unlike an inspector [in a planning case], whose position was described by Lord Hoffman [in R. v. Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Holding and Barnes, Alconbury Developments Ltd and Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, [2001] UKHL 23; [2001] 2 All ER 929: see Holding and Barnes plc v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 2352/02, ECHR 2002] as independent, the same cannot be said of a councillor who is directly connected to one of the parties to the dispute, namely the Council. - EGMR, 24.08.2004 - 60860/00
TSFAYO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Unlike an inspector [in a planning case], whose position was described by Lord Hoffman [in R. v. Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Holding and Barnes, Alconbury Developments Ltd and Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, [2001] UKHL 23; [2001] 2 All ER 929: see Holding and Barnes plc v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 2352/02, ECHR 2002] as independent, the same cannot be said of a councillor who is directly connected to one of the parties to the dispute, namely the Council.