Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 38318/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,47023) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUNDE v. NORWAY
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89
JERSILD v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 38318/97
The particular stigma attached to being mentioned in such a publication must have implications for the "duties and responsibilities" of its author in his exercise of academic freedom, and the need to protect personal reputations (see, mutatis mutandis, the Jersild v. Denmark judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, pp. 23-24, § 31, and Andreas Wabl v. Austria, no. 24773/94, § 41, 21 March 2000, unpublished). - EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 38318/97
In a number of recent cases concerning restrictions on press freedom (see, for instance, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 65, ECHR 1999-III), the Court has pointed out that these "duties and responsibilities" assume significance if the reputation of private individuals is under attack and the "rights of others" may be undermined.
- EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 35090/07
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA
In conclusion, to the extent the remainder of the Article 10 complaint has been substantiated, the Court has found no indication that by their judgments the domestic courts overstepped the margin of appreciation accorded to them under Article 10 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Verdens Gang and Aase v. Norway (dec.), no. 45710/99, ECHR 2001-X, Lunde v. Norway (dec.), no. 38318/97, 13 February 2001 and Campmany and Lopez Galiacho Perona v. Spain (dec.), no. 54224/00, ECHR 2000-XII).