Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 10641/12 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LEMGHARI AND HAJJAJ v. TURKEY
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 10641/12
- EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 10641/12
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 30471/08
ABDOLKHANI ET KARIMNIA c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 10641/12
The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).
The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).
The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).
- EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 72710/11
YARASHONEN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 10641/12
The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).
The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).
The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the conditions of detention at the Kumkapi Foreigners" Removal Centre where the applicant was held, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey, no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).