Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,64725) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MURAVSKAYA v. UKRAINE
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 249/03
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03
There is also a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition implicit in this context (see Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-40, §§ 102-04, and Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03
However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating the use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in ensuring public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 390-95, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 249/03
However, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating the use of lethal force or a disappearance may generally be regarded as essential in ensuring public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, in general, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 108-15, ECHR 2001-III, and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 390-95, ECHR 2001-VII).