Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 75031/13, 75282/13, 75286/13, 75292/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.10.2021 - 75031/13, 75282/13, 75286/13, 75292/13 (https://dejure.org/2021,41231)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Oktober 2021 - 75031/13, 75282/13, 75286/13, 75292/13 (https://dejure.org/2021,41231)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,41231) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KAPA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KAPA v. POLAND and 3 other applications
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
LÓPEZ OSTRA c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 75031/13
The Court further reiterates that although there is no explicit right in the Convention to a clean and quiet environment, where an individual is directly and seriously affected by severe environmental harm such as noise or other pollution, an issue may arise under Article 8 of the Convention (see Hatton and Others, cited above, § 96; López Ostra v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C; Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 18, § 40; and Furlepa v. Poland (dec.), no. 62101/00, 18 March 2008). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 75031/13
The Court further reiterates that although there is no explicit right in the Convention to a clean and quiet environment, where an individual is directly and seriously affected by severe environmental harm such as noise or other pollution, an issue may arise under Article 8 of the Convention (see Hatton and Others, cited above, § 96; López Ostra v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C; Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, p. 18, § 40; and Furlepa v. Poland (dec.), no. 62101/00, 18 March 2008). - EuGH, 12.02.2010 - C-408/09
Município de Barcelos
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 75031/13
Civil proceedings against the national roads and motorways authority 75. On 1 April 2009 the applicants brought a civil action against the State Treasury and the national roads and motorways authority, seeking compensation for damage to their physical and mental health and the infringement of their right to a peaceful and undisturbed private and family life, home and feeling of security (case no. XXV C 408/09).
- EGMR, 08.09.2022 - 1434/14
JANSONS v. LATVIA
75031/13 and 3 others, § 150, 14 October 2021). - EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 41892/19
THIBAUT c. FRANCE
La Cour rappelle que, bien que la Convention ne reconnaisse pas expressément le droit à un environnement sain et calme, une question peut se poser sous l'angle de l'article 8 lorsqu'une personne pâtit directement et gravement du bruit ou d'autres formes de pollution ou de nuisances (pour un exemple récent, voir Kapa et autres c. Pologne, nos 75031/13 et 3 autres, § 149, 14 octobre 2021).