Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  V.B. v. ROMANIA

  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BARBAT v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  The Court reiterates that, where the applicant has died after lodging an application, it has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

  DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  The Court has accepted in various contexts that the applicant's heirs or close family members may have legitimate interest in pursuing the application (see, for example, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI; Novinskiy v. Russia, no. 11982/02, § 92, 10 February 2009; and Larionovs and Tess v. Lativia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 30.03.2009 - 19324/02

  Léger ./. Frankreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  Against this background, the Court finds that the request to pursue the proceedings was submitted by persons who have failed to provide evidence of their status as heirs of the late applicant and of their legitimate interest to pursue the application (see, mutatis mutandis, Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 50, 30 March 2009, Moisa v. Romania (dec.), no. 30608/02, 16 November 2010).

 
• EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04

  LARIONOVS AND TESS v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  45520/04 and 19363/05, §§ 133 and 172-73, 25 November 2014).
• EGMR, 16.10.2003 - 76737/01

  ANDREYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  Having claimed to be the applicant's heirs, Ms I.D.B. and Ms A.D.D. did not provide any document, such as a succession certificate, to confirm their ability to inherit from the late applicant or the acceptance of the late applicant's succession or any statement confirming that they had accepted the succession after their deceased father (contrast Romankevic v. Lithuania, no. 25747/07, § 15, 2 December 2014) or detailed information on the applicant's and their family situation which could be of relevance in their particular case (contrast Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003).
• EGMR, 26.11.2009 - 23593/03

  BELSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  Furthermore, the Court has established that it is for the heir who wishes to pursue the proceedings before the Court to substantiate his or her standing to do so (see, for example, Belskiy v. Russia (dec.), no. 23593/03, 26 November 2009).
• EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 30608/02

  MOISA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  Against this background, the Court finds that the request to pursue the proceedings was submitted by persons who have failed to provide evidence of their status as heirs of the late applicant and of their legitimate interest to pursue the application (see, mutatis mutandis, Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 50, 30 March 2009, Moisa v. Romania (dec.), no. 30608/02, 16 November 2010).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 25747/07

  ROMANKEVIC v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 71569/14

  Having claimed to be the applicant's heirs, Ms I.D.B. and Ms A.D.D. did not provide any document, such as a succession certificate, to confirm their ability to inherit from the late applicant or the acceptance of the late applicant's succession or any statement confirming that they had accepted the succession after their deceased father (contrast Romankevic v. Lithuania, no. 25747/07, § 15, 2 December 2014) or detailed information on the applicant's and their family situation which could be of relevance in their particular case (contrast Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003).

• EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 49499/18

  DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Against this background, the Court finds that the request to pursue the proceedings was submitted by a person who has failed to provide evidence of his status as a heir of the late applicant and of his legitimate interest to pursue the application (see, mutatis mutandis, Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 50, 30 March 2009, Moisa v. Romania (dec.), no. 30608/02, 16 November 2010, and most recently, V.B. v. Romania (dec.) [Committee], no. 71569/14, 14 December 2021).