Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 42194/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68721) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TAMIR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98
KARNER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 42194/05
The Court reiterates that the existence of a victim of a violation, that is to say, an individual who is personally affected by an alleged violation of a Convention right, is indispensable for putting the protection mechanism of the Convention into motion, although this criterion is not to be applied in a rigid, mechanical and inflexible way throughout the proceedings (see Karner v. Austria, 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95
DALBAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 42194/05
The Court considers, however, that the present case must be distinguished from those cases which were introduced before this Court by the applicants themselves and only continued by their relatives after their subsequent death (see Fairfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790/04, ECHR 2005-VI, with reference back to Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI). - EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 57001/00
STRAIN ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 42194/05
The relevant legal provisions and jurisprudence are described in the following judgments: Brumarescu v. Romania ([GC], no. 28342/95, §§ 31-33, ECHR 1999-VII); Strain and Others v. Romania (no. 57001/00, §§ 19-26, ECHR 2005-VII); Paduraru v. Romania (no. 63252/00, §§ 38-53, 1 December 2005); and Tudor v. Romania (no. 29035/05, §§ 15-20, 17 January 2008). - EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 29035/05
TUDOR c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 42194/05
The relevant legal provisions and jurisprudence are described in the following judgments: Brumarescu v. Romania ([GC], no. 28342/95, §§ 31-33, ECHR 1999-VII); Strain and Others v. Romania (no. 57001/00, §§ 19-26, ECHR 2005-VII); Paduraru v. Romania (no. 63252/00, §§ 38-53, 1 December 2005); and Tudor v. Romania (no. 29035/05, §§ 15-20, 17 January 2008). - EGMR, 08.03.2005 - 24790/04
FAIRFIELD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 42194/05
The Court considers, however, that the present case must be distinguished from those cases which were introduced before this Court by the applicants themselves and only continued by their relatives after their subsequent death (see Fairfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790/04, ECHR 2005-VI, with reference back to Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI).