Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,65522) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FRYCKMAN AND FRYCKMAN YHTIO OY v. FINLAND
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97
- EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 36288/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97
The objective impartiality may be jeopardised if a judge takes part in several consecutive stages of the same set of proceedings (see, e.g., the Piersack v. Belgium judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53, pp. 14-15, § 30). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97
The Court recalls that its power to review domestic law is limited (see, inter alia, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 16, § 47). - EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97
However, the three rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and the third rules are concerned with particular interferences with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and should therefore be construed in the light of the general principle enunciated in the first rule (see, among many other authorities, AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 17, § 48). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97
Its essential aim is to secure an equality of arms in the matter (see, e.g., Vidal v. Belgium, judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, p. 32, § 33). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 36288/97
Since Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52), it also follows that the applicants" complaint under this provision fails.