Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 22487/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64504) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ATESSÖNMEZ v. TURKEY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 22487/05
It follows that these complaints must be declared inadmissible as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention (see, in particular, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 22487/05
It follows that these complaints must be declared inadmissible as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention (see, in particular, Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 22487/05
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present application (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, and Karakullukçu v. Turkey, no. 49275/99, §§ 30-39, 22 November 2005).