Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 2 MRK
  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing Adversarial trial) Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-general (Article 2 para. 2 ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 37981/06
• EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 37981/06, 38022/06, 39122/06, 44278/06
• EGMR, 14.09.2016 - 37981/06
• EGMR - 37981/06

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86

  LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 37981/06

  It is true that even where the evidence of an absent witness has not been sole or decisive, the Court has still found a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) when no good reason has been shown for the failure to have the witnesses examined (see, for example, in Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, Mild and Virtanen v. Finland, no. 39481/98 and 40227/98, 26 July 2005, Bonev v. Bulgaria, no. 60018/00, 8 June 2006; and Pello v. Estonia, no. 11423/03, 12 April 2007).
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 60018/00

  Konfrontationsrecht (Verwertungsverbot hinsichtlich einer entscheidenden …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 37981/06

  It is true that even where the evidence of an absent witness has not been sole or decisive, the Court has still found a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) when no good reason has been shown for the failure to have the witnesses examined (see, for example, in Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, Mild and Virtanen v. Finland, no. 39481/98 and 40227/98, 26 July 2005, Bonev v. Bulgaria, no. 60018/00, 8 June 2006; and Pello v. Estonia, no. 11423/03, 12 April 2007).
• EGMR, 26.07.2005 - 39481/98

  MILD AND VIRTANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 37981/06

  It is true that even where the evidence of an absent witness has not been sole or decisive, the Court has still found a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) when no good reason has been shown for the failure to have the witnesses examined (see, for example, in Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, Mild and Virtanen v. Finland, no. 39481/98 and 40227/98, 26 July 2005, Bonev v. Bulgaria, no. 60018/00, 8 June 2006; and Pello v. Estonia, no. 11423/03, 12 April 2007).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 11423/03

  PELLO v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 37981/06

  It is true that even where the evidence of an absent witness has not been sole or decisive, the Court has still found a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) when no good reason has been shown for the failure to have the witnesses examined (see, for example, in Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, Mild and Virtanen v. Finland, no. 39481/98 and 40227/98, 26 July 2005, Bonev v. Bulgaria, no. 60018/00, 8 June 2006; and Pello v. Estonia, no. 11423/03, 12 April 2007).

• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 9154/10

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Al-Khawaja-Test; Recht auf ein …

  Nach Ansicht der Drittbeteiligten müsste der Gerichtshof, bevor er prüft, ob triftige Gründe für die Zulassung der Aussage eines abwesenden Zeugen als Beweismittel vorliegen (…sie beruft sich hier auf das Urteil Al-Khawaja und Tahery, a.a.O., Rdnr. 120), zunächst prüfen, ob die streitgegenständliche Aussage das einzige bzw. entscheidende Beweismittel gewesen ist, das zur Verurteilung des Angeklagten geführt hat, so wie der Gerichtshof dies beispielsweise in den Rechtssachen Sarkizov u.a../. Bulgarien (Nr. 37981/06, 38022/06, 39122/06 und 44278/06, Rdnr. 58, 17.